Strain-specific outcomes of repeated social defeat and chronic fluoxetine treatment in the mouse
Abstract
Social stress is a risk factor for affective disorders in vulnerable individuals. Although the biological nature of stress susceptibility/resilience remains to be elucidated, genetic variation is considered amongst the principal contributors to brain disorders. Furthermore, genetic predisposition may be determinant for the therapeutic outcome, as proposed for antidepressant treatments. In the present studies we compared the inherently diverse genetic backgrounds of 2 mouse strains by assessing the efficacy of a chronic antidepressant treatment in a repeated social stress procedure. C57BL/6J and BalbC mice underwent 10-day social defeats followed by 28-day fluoxetine treatment (10 mg/kg/mL, p.o.). In C57BL/6J, most of the social defeat-induced changes were of metabolic nature including persistently altered feed efficiency and decreased abdominal fat stores that were ameliorated by fluoxetine. BalbC mouse behavior was persistently affected by social defeat both in the social avoidance and the forced swim tests, and in either procedure it was restored by chronic fluoxetine, whereas their endocrine parameters were mostly unaffected. The highlighted strain-specific responsivity to the metabolic and behavioral consequences of social defeat and to the chronic antidepressant treatment offers a promising research tool to further explore the underlying neural mechanisms and genetic basis of stress susceptibility and treatment response.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The C57BL/6J line appears to be less susceptible to stress when compared with other strains.
“Of note, a series of recent papers suggests that the C57BL/6J line appears to be less susceptible to stress when compared with other strains39–41.”
From A standardized protocol for repeated social defeat stress in mice (2011) · cites this paper as [40]
Cites
Rush, A. J., Trivedi, M. H., Wisniewski, S. R., Nierenberg, A. A., Stewart, J. W., Warden, D., Niederehe, G., Thase, M. E., Lavori, P. W., Lebowitz, B. D., et al. (2006) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/ajp.2006.163.11.1905 · Cited by 5,643 · see citing works
Krishnan, V., Han, M.-H., Graham, D. L., Berton, O., Renthal, W., Russo, S. J., LaPlant, Q., Graham, A., Lutter, M., Lagace, D. C., et al. (2007) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2007.09.018 · Cited by 2,307 · see citing works
Sustained hippocampal chromatin regulation in a mouse model of depression and antidepressant action
Tsankova, N. M., Berton, O., Renthal, W., Kumar, A., Neve, R. L., & Nestler, E. J. (2006) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1659 · Cited by 1,780 · see citing works
Risk and resilience: genetic and environmental influences on development of the stress response
Gillespie, C. F., Phifer, J., Bradley, B., & Ressler, K. J. (2009) · Depression and Anxiety · doi:10.1002/da.20605 · Cited by 351 · see citing works
Fairless, A. H., Dow, H. C., Toledo, M. M., Malkus, K. A., Edelmann, M., Li, H., Talbot, K., Arnold, S. E., Abel, T., & Brodkin, E. S. (2008) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2008.07.025 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A standardized protocol for repeated social defeat stress in mice
Golden, S. A., Covington, H. E., Berton, O., & Russo, S. J. (2011) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2011.361 · Cited by 1,581 · see citing works
Defeat stress in rodents: from behavior to molecules
Hammels, C., Pishva, E., De Vry, J., van den Hove, D. L. A., Prickaerts, J., van Winkel, R., Selten, J.-P., Lesch, K.-P., Daskalakis, N. P., Steinbusch, H. W. M., et al. (2015) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.10.006 · Cited by 230 · see citing works
Monteiro, S., Roque, S., de Sá-Calçada, D., Sousa, N., Correia-Neves, M., & Cerqueira, J. J. (2015) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2015.00006 · Cited by 216 · see citing works
Reliability of the chronic mild stress model of depression: A user survey
Willner, P. (2017) · Neurobiology of Stress · doi:10.1016/j.ynstr.2016.08.001 · Cited by 198 · see citing works
- Authors
- Razzoli, M., Carboni, L., Andreoli, M., Michielin, F., Ballottari, A., & Arban, R.
- Affiliations
- GlaxoSmithKline (Italy) (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Razzoli, Maria
- Venue
- Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-01
- Volume
- 97
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 566-576
- ISSN
- 0091-3057 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2064113443
- Cited by
- 46
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 0.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
- Keywords
- social defeat, antidepressant response, genetic strain differences, C57BL/6J mice, BALB/c mice, social stress, stress vulnerability, stress resilience, feed efficiency, abdominal fat, social avoidance, forced swim test, endocrine parameters, mood disorders
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Behavior, Animal, Fluoxetine, Male, Mice, Inbred BALB C, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Organ Size, Social Behavior, Species Specificity, Stress, Physiological, Swimming, Biomarkers, Antidepressive Agents, Second-Generation, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review