The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
More is better: the diversity of terpene metabolism in plants
Open accessAbstract
All plants synthesize a diverse array of terpenoid metabolites. Some are common to all, but many are synthesized only in specific taxa and presumably evolved as adaptations to specific ecological conditions. While the basic terpenoid biosynthetic pathways are common in all plants, recent discoveries have revealed many variations in the way plants synthesized specific terpenes. A major theme is the much greater number of substrates that can be used by enzymes belonging to the terpene synthase (TPS) family. Other recent discoveries include non-TPS enzymes that catalyze the formation of terpenes, and novel transport mechanisms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Chen, F., Tholl, D., Bohlmann, J., & Pichersky, E. (2011) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1365-313x.2011.04520.x · Cited by 1,446
Self-citationStructural and Chemical Biology of Terpenoid Cyclases
Christianson, D. W. (2017) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00287 · Cited by 1,223
Network Analysis of the MVA and MEP Pathways for Isoprenoid Synthesis
Vranová, E., Coman, D., & Gruissem, W. (2013) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev-arplant-050312-120116 · Cited by 1,160
Why do plants produce so many terpenoid compounds?
Pichersky, E., & Raguso, R. A. (2018) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.14178 · Cited by 709
Self-citationSchilmiller, A. L., Schauvinhold, I., Larson, M., Xu, R., Charbonneau, A. L., Schmidt, A., Wilkerson, C., Last, R. L., & Pichersky, E. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0904113106 · Cited by 416
Self-citationThe Tomato Terpene Synthase Gene Family
Falara, V., Akhtar, T. A., Nguyen, T. T. H., Spyropoulou, E. A., Bleeker, P. M., Schauvinhold, I., Matsuba, Y., Bonini, M. E., Schilmiller, A. L., Last, R. L., et al. (2011) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.111.179648 · Cited by 361
Self-citationSallaud, C., Rontein, D., Onillon, S., Jabès, F., Duffé, P., Giacalone, C., Thoraval, S., Escoffier, C., Herbette, G., Leonhardt, N., et al. (2009) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.107.057885 · Cited by 315
Biosynthesis of monoterpene scent compounds in roses
Magnard, J.-L., Roccia, A., Caissard, J.-C., Vergne, P., Sun, P., Hecquet, R., Dubois, A., Hibrand-Saint Oyant, L., Jullien, F., Nicolè, F., et al. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aab0696 · Cited by 273
Hayashi, K.-I., Kawaide, H., Notomi, M., Sakigi, Y., Matsuo, A., & Nozaki, H. (2006) · FEBS Letters · doi:10.1016/j.febslet.2006.10.018 · Cited by 220
Lee, S., Badieyan, S., Bevan, D. R., Herde, M., Gatz, C., & Tholl, D. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1009975107 · Cited by 200
Cited by
Gurav, T. P., Dholakia, B. B., & Giri, A. P. (2022) · Phytochemistry Reviews · doi:10.1007/s11101-021-09767-z · Cited by 87
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhou, F., & Pichersky, E.
- Venue
- Current Opinion in Plant Biology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-06
- Volume
- 55
- Pages
- 1-10
- ISSN
- 1369-5266 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3007987127
- Cited by
- 312
- References
- 45
- FWCI
- 3.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: More is better: the diversity of terpene metabolism in plants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.pbi.2020.01.005
- The paper
- Zhou, F., & Pichersky, E. (2020). More is better: the diversity of terpene metabolism in plants. Current Opinion in Plant Biology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2020.01.005
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
