Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 709

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 63 of the 63 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Why do plants produce so many terpenoid compounds?

Open access
Pichersky, Eran, Raguso, Robert A.·2018·New Phytologist

Abstract

Summary: All plants synthesize a suite of several hundred terpenoid compounds with roles that include phytohormones, protein modification reagents, anti‐oxidants, and more. Different plant lineages also synthesize hundreds of distinct terpenoids, with the total number of such specialized plant terpenoids estimated in the scores of thousands. Phylogenetically restricted terpenoids are implicated in defense or in the attraction of beneficial organisms. A popular hypothesis is that the ability of plants to synthesize new compounds arose incrementally by selection when, as a result of gradual changes in their biotic partners and enemies, the ‘old’ plant compounds were no longer effective, a process dubbed the ‘coevolutionary arms race’. Another hypothesis posits that often the sheer diversity of such compounds provides benefits that a single compound cannot. In this article, we review the unique features of the biosynthetic apparatus of terpenes in plants that facilitate the production of large numbers of distinct terpenoids in each species and how facile genetic and biochemical changes can lead to the further diversification of terpenoids. We then discuss evidence relating to the hypotheses that given ecological functions may be enhanced by the presence of mixtures of terpenes and that the acquisition of new functions by terpenoids may favor their retention once the original functions are lost.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/nph.14178

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 63 references

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. 10.1073/pnas.0608253104 · doi:10.1073/pnas.0608253104
  2. 10.1098/rspb.2014.2346 · doi:10.1098/rspb.2014.2346
  3. 10.1111/tpj.12859 · doi:10.1111/tpj.12859
  4. 10.1007/s10886-008-9558-4 · doi:10.1007/s10886-008-9558-4
  5. 10.1074/jbc.M112.431171 · doi:10.1074/jbc.m112.431171
  6. Djerassi C, 1990, Profiles, pathways, and dreams
  7. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01509.x · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01509.x
  8. 10.1007/s10886-011-0043-0 · doi:10.1007/s10886-011-0043-0
  9. 10.1007/s10886-013-0368-y · doi:10.1007/s10886-013-0368-y
  10. Stewart A, 2013, The drunken botanist: the plants that create the World's great drinks
  11. 10.3732/ajb.92.10.1624 · doi:10.3732/ajb.92.10.1624
  12. 10.1126/science.1145147 · doi:10.1126/science.1145147
  13. 10.1016/j.phytochem.2014.12.005 · doi:10.1016/j.phytochem.2014.12.005
  14. 10.1007/s00265-006-0227-8 · doi:10.1007/s00265-006-0227-8

Cited by

See all 709

Metadata

Authors
Pichersky, E., & Raguso, R. A.
Venue
New Phytologist
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-09-08
Volume
220
Issue
3
Pages
692-702
ISSN
  • 0028-646X (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8137
OpenAlex
W2509940547
Cited by
709
References
63
FWCI
8.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze
Licence
Funders
National Science Foundation of the USA (IOS-1025636, DEB-1342792)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Why do plants produce so many terpenoid compounds? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/nph.14178
The paper
Pichersky, E., & Raguso, R. A. (2018). Why do plants produce so many terpenoid compounds? New Phytologist. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.14178

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.