Cited by 133Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of LifeCancer survivorship and careFamily Support in Illness

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 89 of the 89 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Psychological Outcomes, Health-Related Quality of Life, and Neurocognitive Functioning in Survivors of Childhood Cancer and Their Parents

Open access
Michel, Gisela, Brinkman, Tara M., Wakefield, Claire E., Grootenhuis, Martha·2020·Pediatric Clinics of North America

Abstract

Childhood cancer disrupts the lives of patients and their families and affects acute and long-term psychological health. This article summarizes (1) psychological challenges, including depression, anxiety, worries, and posttraumatic stress, as well as positive outcomes such as benefit finding and posttraumatic growth in young survivors and parents; (2) health-related quality of life; (3) interventions to support survivors and parents with psychological difficulties; and (4) neurocognitive problems and interventions to help alleviate them. Although many survivors and parents fare well in the long term, many survivors may benefit from interventions. Interventions should be further evaluated and integrated into routine clinical care.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pcl.2020.07.005

Cites

89 of 89 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 89 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Michel, G., Brinkman, T. M., Wakefield, C. E., & Grootenhuis, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Lucerne (CH)
  • St. Jude Children's Research Hospital (US)
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
  • Princess Máxima Center (NL)
Corresponding author
Michel, Gisela
Venue
Pediatric Clinics of North America
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-12
Volume
67
Issue
6
Pages
1103-1134
ISSN
0031-3955 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3089288901
Cited by
133
References
89
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 1
FWCI
2.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Pediatric Clinics of North America (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family Support in Illness
Keywords
childhood cancer survivors, parental caregivers, psychological outcomes, health-related quality of life, neurocognitive function, depression, anxiety, post-traumatic stress, benefit finding, posttraumatic growth, psychological intervention, neurocognitive interventions
MeSH terms
Cancer Survivors, Adaptation, Psychological, Humans, Mental Health, Parents, Quality of Life, Stress, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review