Cited by 20Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer StudiesPhotodynamic Therapy Research StudiesSkin Protection and Aging

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

No room for pain: A prospective study showing effective and nearly pain-free treatment of actinic keratosis with simulated daylight photodynamic therapy (SDL-PDT) using the IndoorLux® System in combination with BF-200 ALA (Ameluz®)

Open access
Bai-Habelski, Jon Chim, Medrano, Karla, Palacio, Ariana, Reinhold, Uwe·2022·Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Photodynamic therapy (PDT) with natural daylight is effective and less painful than conventional PDT when treating actinic keratosis (AK), however its weather dependency is restrictive. This prospective open-label observational single-arm study examined efficacy and safety of simulated daylight (SDL)-PDT using the IndoorLux® system in combination with 5-aminolevulinic acid gel (BF-200 ALA). METHODS: 12 patients with mild/moderate AK on the face or scalp received two SDL-PDTs. BF-200 ALA was applied prior to a 2 h illumination with the IndoorLux® System. Patients evaluated pain during and after SDL-PDT on visual analogue scales (VAS). Primary endpoint was lesion count reduction three months after the second SDL-PDT. Secondary endpoint was pain during and after illumination. RESULTS: Median individual clearance rate was 83.75% (66.7-100.0%); 33.3% of the patients and 84.9% of the lesions were completely cleared. Median size of the remaining partially cleared lesions decreased by 42.9%. The first SDL-PDT was pain-free for 7 patients (58.3%, VAS=0). Median VAS during and after the first treatment was 0 (0.0-0.3). For the second SDL-PDT, median VAS was 0.1 (0.0-5.5, during) and 0 (0.0-4.5, after). Both SDL-PDTs were pain-free for 6 patients. CONCLUSION: SDL-PDT was effective and nearly pain-free, emphasizing its advantages and potential for common practice.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2021.102692

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a recent clinical study, BF-200 ALA-PDT using the IndoorLux system, a simulated daylight source, completely cleared about 85% of lesions in AK patients with virtually no pain.

    “In a recent clinical study, BF-200 ALA-PDT using the IndoorLux system, a simulated daylight source, was shown to be able to completely clear about 85% of lesions in AK patients with virtually no pain [73].”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 18 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Bai-Habelski, J. C., Medrano, K., Palacio, A., & Reinhold, U.
Venue
Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-03
Volume
37
Pages
102692
ISSN
1572-1000 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4200233290
Cited by
20
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3
FWCI
2.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Photodynamic Therapy Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Skin Protection and Aging
Keywords
actinic keratosis, 5-aminolevulinic acid, treatment pain, lesion clearance, facial and scalp lesions
MeSH terms
Aminolevulinic Acid, Humans, Pain, Photochemotherapy, Prospective Studies, Scalp, Treatment Outcome, Photosensitizing Agents, Keratosis, Actinic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review