The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Patients’ perceptions of visit companions’ helpfulness during Japanese geriatric medical visits
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Few studies have examined the very significant role played by MVCs before and after a healthcare visit [12] with most literature focusing purely on their contributions during the healthcare encounter [3, 7–10, 14, 21, 31].”
From Non-spouse companions accompanying older adults to medical visits: a qualitative analysis (2019) · cites this paper as [8]
In the citing paper
“The presence of a companion favorably influences physician and patient understanding [6–9]”
From Non-spouse companions accompanying older adults to medical visits: a qualitative analysis (2019) · cites this paper as [8]
In the citing paper
“These studies typically examine the influence of the companion on the provider, the patient, or on the provider-patient interaction and report similar roles to those described by our participants; advocacy and assistance with communication and information exchange.”
From Non-spouse companions accompanying older adults to medical visits: a qualitative analysis (2019) · cites this paper as [8]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 22
- Adelman, 2000, Communication between older patients and their physicians, Clin Geriatr Med, 16, 1, 10.1016/S0749-0690(05)70004-5 · DOI · Paper page
- Roter, 2000, The outpatient medical encounter and elderly patients, Clin Geriatr Med, 16, 95, 10.1016/S0749-0690(05)70011-2 · DOI
- Adelman, 1987, The physician–elderly patient–companion triad in the medical encounter: the development of a conceptual framework and research agenda, Gerontologist, 27, 729, 10.1093/geront/27.6.729 · DOI
- Beisecker, 1989, The influence of a companion on the doctor-elderly patient interaction, Health Commun, 1, 55, 10.1207/s15327027hc0101_7 · DOI · Paper page
- Brown, 1998, Roles and influence of people who accompany patients on visits to the doctor, Can Fam Physician, 44, 1644
- Main, 2001, The effect of families on the process of outpatient visits in family practice, J Fam Pract, 50, 888
- Prohaska, 1996, Patients’ views of family involvement in medical care decisions and encounters, Res Aging, 18, 52, 10.1177/0164027596181004 · DOI · Paper page
- Baker, 1997, Laughter in triadic geriatric medical encounters: a transcript-based analysis, Soc Perspect Emotion, 4, 179
- Greene, 1994, Older patient satisfaction with communication during an initial medical encounter, Soc Sci Med, 38, 1279, 10.1016/0277-9536(94)90191-0 · DOI · Paper page
- Schilling, 2002, The third person in the room: frequency, role, and influence of companions during primary care medical encounters, J Fam Pract, 51, 685
- Hasselkus, 1994, Three track care: older patients, family member, and physician in the medical visit, J Aging Stud, 8, 291, 10.1016/0890-4065(94)90005-1 · DOI
- Labrecque, 1991, The impact of family presence on the physician–cancer patient interaction, Soc Sci Med, 33, 1253, 10.1016/0277-9536(91)90073-L · DOI
- Fukuhara, 1998, Translation, adaptation, and validation of the SF-36 Health Survey for use in Japan, J Clin Epidemiol, 51, 1037, 10.1016/S0895-4356(98)00095-X · DOI · Paper page
- Ishikawa, 2005, Physician–elderly patient–companion communication in Japanese geriatric encoutners, Soc Sci Med, 60, 2307, 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.08.071 · DOI
- Clayman, 2005, The effect of companions on decision-making activity in geriatric primary care visits, Soc Sci Med, 60, 1583, 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.08.004 · DOI · Paper page
- Zeger, 1986, Longitudinal data analysis for discrete and continuous outcomes, Biometrics, 42, 121, 10.2307/2531248 · DOI · Paper page
- Solano, 1985, Two's company: self-disclosure and reciprocity in triads versus dyads, Soc Psychol Q, 48, 183, 10.2307/3033613 · DOI
- Aujoulat, 2002, Communication difficulties of healthcare professionals and family caregivers of HIV infected patients, Patient Educ Couns, 47, 213, 10.1016/S0738-3991(01)00197-5 · doi:10.1016/s0738-3991(01)00197-5
- Barone, 1999, How physicians view caregivers: Simmel in the examination room, Sociol Perspect, 42, 673, 10.2307/1389579 · DOI
- Asai, 1998, Advance directives and other medical decisions concerning the end of life in cancer patients in Japan, Eur J Cancer, 34, 1582, 10.1016/S0959-8049(98)00148-8 · DOI
- Hattori, 1991, The patient's right to information in Japan—legal rules and doctor's opinions, Soc Sci Med, 32, 1007, 10.1016/0277-9536(91)90158-9 · DOI
- Ruhnke, 2000, Ethical decision making and patient autonomy: a comparison of physicians and patients in Japan and the United States, Chest, 118, 1172, 10.1378/chest.118.4.1172 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Wolff, J. L., Guan, Y., Boyd, C. M., Vick, J., Amjad, H., Roth, D. L., Gitlin, L. N., & Roter, D. L. (2017) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2016.10.022 · Cited by 65
Self-citationNon-spouse companions accompanying older adults to medical visits: a qualitative analysis
Sheehan, O. C., Graham-Phillips, A. L., Wilson, J. D., Crews, D. C., Holt, C. L., Gabbard, J., Smith, K. C., Wolff, J. L., & Roth, D. L. (2019) · BMC Geriatrics · doi:10.1186/s12877-019-1098-y · Cited by 26
Metadata
- Authors
- Ishikawa, H., Roter, D. L., Yamazaki, Y., Hashimoto, H., & Yano, E.
- Venue
- Patient Education and Counseling
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006-04
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 80-86
- ISSN
- 0738-3991
- Cited by
- 40
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
- Licence
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Patients’ perceptions of visit companions’ helpfulness during Japanese geriatric medical visits. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.pec.2005.02.010
- The paper
- Ishikawa, H., Roter, D. L., Yamazaki, Y., Hashimoto, H., & Yano, E. (2006). Patients’ perceptions of visit companions’ helpfulness during Japanese geriatric medical visits. Patient Education and Counseling. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2005.02.010
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
