The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cancer survivors information seeking behaviors: A comparison of survivors who do and do not seek information about cancer
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE To examine the cancer information seeking behaviors and preferences of cancer survivors. METHODS This cross-sectional study used the National Cancer Institute's 2003 Health Information National Trends Survey data to evaluate 619 cancer survivors. RESULTS Two-thirds (67.5%, n = 418) of the survivors sought cancer information (InfoSeek) and 32.5% (n = 201) did not (NoInfoSeek). Significant predictors of cancer information seeking included age (less than 65), gender (female), income (>US$ 25,000/year), and having a regular health care provider (HCP). CONCLUSION Not all survivors actively look for cancer information. Although most survivors prefer receiving cancer information from their HCP, many turn to a variety of other sources, primarily the Internet. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS HCPs should periodically assess information seeking behaviors and preferences of cancer survivors and actively refer patients to the Internet as an extension of and enhancement to their patient interactions. Credible and useful websites could be identified and recommended by the HCP as a means to address some of the barriers identified by survivors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Consumer health information seeking on the internet: the state of the art
Cline, R. J. W. (2001) · Health Education Research · doi:10.1093/her/16.6.671 · Cited by 1,708 · cited 2×
“The Internet has become an important channel for the exchange of cancer information and support [28, 30, 48, 51, 52, 52].”
BackgroundToward a Theory of Motivated Information Management
Afifi, W. A., & Weiner, J. L. (2004) · Communication Theory · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2004.tb00310.x · Cited by 683
Factors Influencing Medical Information Seeking Among African American Cancer Patients
Matthews, A. K., Sellergren, S. A., Manfredi, C., & Williams, M. (2002) · Journal of Health Communication · doi:10.1080/10810730290088094 · Cited by 233 · cited 1×
“The amount and timing of information desired varied in those with a blunting style (avoiding threatening information) or for those trying to maintain hope [5, 11, 12, 18, 20-24].”
Background
Cited by
Health information seeking behaviour: A concept analysis
Zimmerman, M. S., & Shaw, G. (2020) · Health Information & Libraries Journal · doi:10.1111/hir.12287 · Cited by 198
Online Health Information Seeking in the Context of the Medical Consultation in Switzerland
Caiata-Zufferey, M., Abraham, A., Sommerhalder, K., & Schulz, P. J. (2010) · Qualitative Health Research · doi:10.1177/1049732310368404 · Cited by 171
Willems, R. A., Bolman, C. A. W., Mesters, I., Kanera, I. M., Beaulen, A. A. J. M., & Lechner, L. (2016) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.3870 · Cited by 122
Health Behaviors in Cancer Survivors
Mayer, D. K., Terrin, N. C., Menon, U., Kreps, G. L., McCance, K., Parsons, S. K., & Mooney, K. H. (2007) · Oncology Nursing Forum · doi:10.1188/07.onf.643-651 · Cited by 111
Self-citationCarpenter, D. M., DeVellis, R. F., Fisher, E. B., DeVellis, B. M., Hogan, S. L., & Jordan, J. M. (2010) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2009.11.006 · Cited by 110
Metadata
- Authors
- Mayer, D. K., Terrin, N. C., Kreps, G. L., Menon, U., McCance, K., Parsons, S. K., & Mooney, K. H.
- Venue
- Patient Education and Counseling
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2007-03
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 342-350
- ISSN
- 0738-3991 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2087188055
- Cited by
- 237
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 17.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
