Cited by 171Health Literacy and Information AccessibilityPatient-Provider Communication in HealthcareInformation Retrieval and Search Behavior

Online Health Information Seeking in the Context of the Medical Consultation in Switzerland

Caiata-Zufferey, Maria, Abraham, Andrea, Sommerhalder, Kathrin, Schulz, Peter J.·2010·Qualitative Health Research

Abstract

A growing number of patients search for medical information on the Internet. Understanding how they use the Internet is important, as this might impact their health, patient—practitioner roles, and general health care provision. In this article, we illustrate the motives of online health information seeking in the context of the doctor—patient relationship in Switzerland. We conducted semistructured interviews with patients who searched for health information online before or after a medical consultation. Findings suggest that patients searched for health information online to achieve the goals of preparing for the consultation, complementing it, validating it, and/or challenging its outcome. The initial motivations for online health information seeking are identified in the needs for acknowledgment, reduction of uncertainty, and perspective. Searching health information online was also encouraged by personal and contextual factors, that is, a person’s sense of self-responsibility and the opportunity to use the Internet. Based on these results, we argue that online health information seeking is less concerned with what happens during the consultation than with what happens before or after it, in the sociocultural context.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1049732310368404

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Caiata-Zufferey, M., Abraham, A., Sommerhalder, K., & Schulz, P. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Lugano, Lugano, Switzerland,
  • University of Bern (CH)
  • Università della Svizzera italiana (CH)
Venue
Qualitative Health Research
Published
2010-05-04
Volume
20
Issue
8
Pages
1050-1061
ISSN
  • 1049-7323 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-7557
OpenAlex
W2100220330
Cited by
171
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 11
FWCI
13.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Qualitative Health Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • BORIS (University Library Bern) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
Keywords
online health information seeking, physician-patient relationship, medical consultation, patient motivation, uncertainty reduction, personal responsibility, patient empowerment, sociocultural context, Switzerland
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Data Collection, Female, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Education as Topic, Patient Participation, Surveys and Questionnaires, Referral and Consultation, Switzerland, Patient Satisfaction, Internet, Information Dissemination, Patient Access to Records, Uncertainty, Qualitative Research, Young Adult, Information Seeking Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review