Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 32

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Development and process evaluation of an Internet-based physical activity behaviour change program

Steele, Rebekah, Mummery, Kerry W., Dwyer, Trudy·2007·Patient Education and Counseling
DOI 10.1016/j.pec.2007.02.013
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Objectives Limited research exists addressing issues of website development and attitudes towards websites that promote physical activity. This paper describes the design and process evaluation of a physical activity intervention, from a randomised trial (RT) that examined the effectiveness of delivery modes (face-to-face, Internet-mediated (combined Internet and face-to-face) and Internet-only). Methods Evaluation surveys were completed at the end of the RT intervention (n=159), and a random sample (n=23) participated in focus group discussions. Differences were assessed using ANOVA, t-tests, and qualitative analysis. Results Face-to-face participants were more satisfied with their group allocation than the Internet groups. Internet groups reported accessing the Internet at home, and that they liked the self-paced nature of the website. Difficulties associated with time and motivation were raised by the Internet groups. No differences were found for content acceptability and credibility. Website usability scores were high for both Internet groups. Conclusion These findings support the use of the Internet in terms of content satisfaction and usability; however, issues were raised regarding the acceptability of an Internet-based program when traditional face-to-face delivery options are available. Practice implications Identifying avenues to support user perceptions of 'motivation', and mechanisms for enhancing engagement and retention, and user acceptability are required.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pec.2007.02.013

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 39 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Patrick, 1999, Prevention, public health, and interactive health communication, Am J Prev Med, 16, 46

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Steele, R., Mummery, K. W., & Dwyer, T.
Venue
Patient Education and Counseling
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-07
Volume
67
Issue
1-2
Pages
127-136
ISSN
0738-3991
DOI
10.1016/j.pec.2007.02.013
Cited by
32
References
39
Language
en
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.