The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Impact Evaluation of a Pilot Web-Based Intervention to Increase Physical Activity
Abstract
Purpose.: The purpose of this pilot study was to conduct an impact evaluation of a 10-week Web-based physical activity intervention. Design.: Quasi-experimental, three-group pretest, posttest design. Setting.: Large Midwestern university. Subjects.: Participants (N = 233) included college students registered for three courses. The study employed a convenience sample consisting of a Web-based group (n = 108), a physical activity group (n = 64), and a general health group (n = 61). Intervention.: The Web-based group received a Social Cognitive Theory behavioral skill-building intervention and exercised 3 days per week in their leisure time. The physical activity group received exercise instruction and was required to attend three physical activity labs per week. The comparison group received health instruction. Measures.: Outcome variables included moderate and vigorous physical activity, self-regulation, social support, self-efficacy, and outcome expectations and expectancies. Analysis.: Differences between groups were assessed at pretest and posttest using multiple analyses of variance. Results.: Vigorous physical activity, self-regulation, and outcome expectancy value changed significantly in the Web-based and physical activity course groups (p < .01). Conclusions.: Even with consideration of limitations such as small sample size and lack of randomization, the Web-based and traditional physical activity lecture and activity lab interventions were superior in eliciting changes in vigorous physical activity, self-regulation, and outcome expectancy value than a traditional health course. (Am J Health Promot 2011;25[4]:227–230.)
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Specifically related to college students, Grim et al. (2011) emphasized that web-based interventions may be a promising means of facilitating behavior change.”
From A Pilot Study of a Cohort-Based Solution-Focused Wellness Group for Graduate Students Using Solution-Focused Coaching 🇵🇱 🇷🇴 (2022) · cites this paper as Grim et al., 2011
Citations
Cites
Dishman, R. (2004) · Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2003.12.007 · Cited by 373
Social support for exercise: Relationship to physical activity in young adults
Treiber, F. A., Baranowski, T., Braden, D. S., Strong, W. B., Levy, M., & Knox, W. (1991) · Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/0091-7435(91)90068-f · Cited by 195
Interactive communication strategies Implications for population-based physical-activity promotion
Marcus, B. (2000) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0749-3797(00)00186-0 · Cited by 170
Research works printed but not linked: 7
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Meta-analysis of internet-delivered interventions to increase physical activity levels
Davies, C. A., Spence, J. C., Vandelanotte, C., Caperchione, C. M., & Mummery, W. (2012) · International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity · doi:10.1186/1479-5868-9-52 · Cited by 488
Pratt, M., Sarmiento, O. L., Montes, F., Ogilvie, D., Marcus, B. H., Perez, L. G., & Brownson, R. C. (2012) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(12)60736-3 · Cited by 295
Roh, M., & Won, Y. (2023) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph20032044 · Cited by 19
Beauchemin, J., Krueger, D., Newman, J., & Beitelspacher, P. (2022) · Journal of Solution Focused Practices · doi:10.59874/001c.74998 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Grim, M., Hortz, B., & Petosa, R.
- Venue
- American Journal of Health Promotion
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2011-03
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 227-230
- ISSN
- 0890-1171
- 2168-6602
- Cited by
- 40
- References
- 3
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Impact Evaluation of a Pilot Web-Based Intervention to Increase Physical Activity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4278/ajhp.081216-arb-307
- The paper
- Grim, M., Hortz, B., & Petosa, R. (2011). Impact Evaluation of a Pilot Web-Based Intervention to Increase Physical Activity. American Journal of Health Promotion. https://doi.org/10.4278/ajhp.081216-arb-307