Cited by 100Consumer Attitudes and Food LabelingConsumer Packaging Perceptions and TrendsConsumer behavior in food and health

A Front-of-Pack Nutrition Logo: A Quantitative and Qualitative Process Evaluation in the Netherlands

Vyth, Ellis L., Steenhuis, Ingrid H. M., Mallant, Sanne F., Mol, Zinzi L., Brug, Johannes, Temminghoff, Marcel, Feunekes, Gerda I., Jansen, Léon +2 more·2009·Journal of Health Communication

Abstract

This study aimed to perform a quantitative and qualitative process evaluation of the introduction of the Choices logo, a front-of-pack nutrition logo on products with a favorable product composition, adopted by many food producers, retail and food service organizations, conditionally endorsed by the Dutch government, validated by scientists, and in the process of international dissemination. An online questionnaire was sent to adult consumers 4 months after the introduction of the logo (n = 1,032) and 1 year later (n = 1,127). Additionally, seven consumer focus groups (n = 41) were conducted to provide more insight into the questionnaire responses. Quantitative analyses showed that exposure to the logo had significantly increased. Elderly and obese respondents reported to be more in need of a logo than younger and normal-weight individuals. Women perceived the logo more attractive and credible than men did. Further qualitative analyses indicated that the logo's credibility would improve if it became known that governmental and scientific authorities support it. Elderly respondents indicated that they needed a logo due to health concerns. Consumers interested in health reported that they used the logo. Further research focusing on specific target groups, forming healthful diets, and health outcomes is needed to investigate the effectiveness of the Choices logo.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10810730903204247

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 31 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vyth, E. L., Steenhuis, I. H. M., Mallant, S. F., Mol, Z. L., Brug, J., Temminghoff, M., Feunekes, G. I., Jansen, L., Verhagen, H., & Seidell, J. C.
Affiliations
  • Amsterdam Public Health (NL)
  • d GfK Panel Services Benelux B.V. , Dongen, The Netherlands
  • e Unilever Food and Health Research Institute , Vlaardingen, The Netherlands
  • Choices International Foundation (NL)
  • National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (NL)
Corresponding author
Vyth, Ellis L.
Venue
Journal of Health Communication
Published
2009-10-22
Volume
14
Issue
7
Pages
631-645
ISSN
  • 1081-0730 (ISSN-L)
  • 1087-0415
OpenAlex
W2156726901
Cited by
100
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 15
FWCI
9.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Health Communication (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Academic REpository of VU University Amsterdam (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Packaging Perceptions and Trends
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Consumer behavior in food and health
Keywords
front-of-pack nutrition labels, nutrition labeling, consumer perception, label credibility, health information seeking, target groups, obesity, older consumers, gender differences, health communication
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Awareness, Consumer Behavior, Female, Food Labeling, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Netherlands, Nutritive Value, Surveys and Questionnaires, Body Mass Index, Focus Groups, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review