Cited by 53Intimate Partner and Family ViolencePatient-Provider Communication in HealthcareElder Abuse and Neglect

Talking matters: Abused women's views on disclosure of partner abuse to the family doctor and its role in handling the abuse situation

Lo Fo Wong, Sylvie, Wester, Fred, Mol, Saskia, Römkens, Renée, Hezemans, Door, Lagro-Janssen, Toine·2008·Patient Education and Counseling

Abstract

Objective We aimed to explore what women valued most in disclosing partner abuse to their doctor and whether disclosure played a role in handling their abuse situation.Methods A qualitative method was used to understand abused women's views and experiences with disclosure to their family doctor. Thirty-six women were interviewed within 4 weeks after disclosure to their family doctor.Results Most women went to see the doctor for some medical complaint, and only three women planned to disclose the abuse. Twenty-five women valued most their doctor's communicative approach with empathy or empowering and nine women valued most the instrumental approach. Eight women of the latter group wanted this combined with a communicative approach. After disclosure to the family doctor, a group of women (n=20) perceived a real change in their possibilities to handle their situation. They appeared to be in a position we named: 'in transition', a state in which they started or continued a process of change. Another group of women (n=13) appeared to be in a 'locked-up' position, a state without any prospect on change, feeling out of control and fearing the abuser. Three women reacted reserved towards change.Conclusion A communicative approach, providing empathy and empowerment, is important to women in disclosing partner abuse. More than half of the women perceived possibilities for a change.Practice implications Talking about abuse is an important step in a woman's process of change. Doctors should acknowledge the advantage of their position as a professional confidant and ask women about abuse.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pec.2007.11.013

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 43 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lo Fo Wong, S., Wester, F., Mol, S., Römkens, R., Hezemans, D., & Lagro-Janssen, T.
Venue
Patient Education and Counseling
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-03
Volume
70
Issue
3
Pages
386-394
ISSN
0738-3991 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2150562999
Cited by
53
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 4
FWCI
3.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Patient Education and Counseling (publishedVersion)
  • Research portal (Tilburg University) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Elder Abuse and Neglect
Keywords
intimate partner violence, disclosure of abuse, general practitioners, battered women, physician-patient communication, empathy, empowerment, women's experiences, help-seeking
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Adult, Attitude to Health, Clinical Competence, Communication, Empathy, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Motivation, Netherlands, Physician-Patient Relations, Physician's Role, Physicians, Family, Power, Psychological, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self Disclosure, Spouse Abuse, Battered Women, Self Efficacy, Qualitative Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review