Cited by 36Diabetes Management and EducationDiabetes Management and ResearchHealth Education and Validation

Psychometric evaluation of the Swedish version of the Hypoglycaemia Fear Survey

Anderbro, Therese, Amsberg, Susanne, Wredling, Regina, Lins, Per-Eric, Adamson, Ulf, Lisspers, Jan, Johansson, Unn-Britt·2008·Patient Education and Counseling

Abstract

Objective The objective of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Swedish version of the Hypoglycaemia Fear Survey (Swe-HFS) for use among Swedish-speaking patients with type 1 diabetes.Methods The HFS was translated using the forward-backward translation method and was thereafter answered by 325 type 1 patients. The psychometric properties were investigated using exploratory factor analysis, Cronbach's alpha, content and convergent validity.Results The factor analysis showed that a three-factor solution was reasonable with the subscales Behaviour/Avoidance (10 items), Worry (6 items) and Aloneness (4 items). Cronbach's alpha coefficient for the total score was 0.85. The result also supports the instrument's content validity and convergent validity.Conclusion The Swedish version of the HFS appears to be a reliable and valid instrument for measuring fear of hypoglycaemia (FoH) in type 1 patients.Practice implications The results from this study suggest that the Swe-HFS, an instrument that is brief and easy to administer, may be valuable in clinically assessing FoH among patients with type 1 diabetes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pec.2008.03.022

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Anderbro, T., Amsberg, S., Wredling, R., Lins, P.-E., Adamson, U., Lisspers, J., & Johansson, U.-B.
Affiliations
  • Danderyds sjukhus (SE)
  • Mid Sweden University (SE)
  • Sophiahemmet University College (SE)
Venue
Patient Education and Counseling
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-10
Volume
73
Issue
1
Pages
127-131
ISSN
0738-3991 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2086880625
Cited by
36
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2
FWCI
1.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Patient Education and Counseling (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Social Sciences › Education › Health Education and Validation
Keywords
fear of hypoglycemia, type 1 diabetes, Swedish translation, psychometric validation, factor structure, content validity, convergent validity, patient-reported outcome measures, worry, aloneness
MeSH terms
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Fear, Female, Humans, Hypoglycemia, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Psychological, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sweden, Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review