Cited by 134Diabetes Management and EducationBehavioral Health and InterventionsDiabetes Management and Research

Goal setting in diabetes self-management: taking the baby steps to success

Open access
DeWalt, Darren A., Davis, Terry C., Wallace, Andrea S., Seligman, Hilary K., Bryant-Shilliday, Betsy, Arnold, Connie L., Freburger, Janet, Schillinger, Dean·2009·Patient Education and Counseling

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the usefulness of a diabetes self-management guide and a brief counseling intervention in helping patients set and achieve their behavioral goals.Methods We conducted a quasi-experimental study using a one group pretest posttest design to assess the effectiveness of a goal setting intervention along with a self-management guide. English- and Spanish-speaking patients with diabetes had one in-person session and two telephone follow-up calls with a non-clinical provider over a 12-16-week period. At each call and at the end of the study, we assessed success in achieving behavioral goals and problem solving toward those goals. Satisfaction with the self-management guide was assessed at the end of the study.Results We enrolled 250 patients across three sites and 229 patients completed the study. Most patients chose to set goals in diet and exercise domains. 93% of patients achieved at least one behavioral goal during the study and 73% achieved at least two behavioral goals. Many patients exhibited problem solving behavior to achieve their goals. We found no significant differences in reported achievement of behavior goals by literacy or language. Patients were very satisfied with the guide.Conclusions A brief goal setting intervention along with a diabetes self-management guide helped patients set and achieve healthy behavioral goals.Practice implications Non-clinical providers can successfully help a diverse range of patients with diabetes set and achieve behavioral goals.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pec.2009.03.012

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Setting small, achievable goals enhances people's ability to cope with their diabetes.

    “An early study by DeWalt and colleagues found that setting small, achievable goals not only enhances people's ability to cope with their diabetes, but that people with diabetes who set and achieved their goals often initiated additional behavioral changes on their own (84).”

    From Clinical Targets for Continuous Glucose Monitoring Data Interpretation: Recommendations From the International Consensus on Time in Range (2019) · cites this paper as [84]

    The Conclusion (section 4.2) says small goals may lead to better coping with diabetes; it does not establish that they enhance coping. The Discussion (section 4.1) does report that patients who set and achieved goals often initiated additional behavioral changes. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • People with diabetes who set and achieved their goals often initiated additional behavioral changes on their own.

    “An early study by DeWalt and colleagues found that setting small, achievable goals not only enhances people's ability to cope with their diabetes, but that people with diabetes who set and achieved their goals often initiated additional behavioral changes on their own (84).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 22 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
DeWalt, D. A., Davis, T. C., Wallace, A. S., Seligman, H. K., Bryant-Shilliday, B., Arnold, C. L., Freburger, J., & Schillinger, D.
Affiliations
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • Louisiana State University (US)
  • University of New Mexico (US)
  • San Francisco General Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
DeWalt, Darren A.
Venue
Patient Education and Counseling
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-11
Volume
77
Issue
2
Pages
218-223
ISSN
0738-3991 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1967547074
Cited by
134
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 12
FWCI
8.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Patient Education and Counseling (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Iowa Research Online (University of Iowa) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • University of California, San Francisco
  • National Institute of Nursing Research (T32 NR 08856, T32NR008856)
  • National Center for Research Resources (UL1RR024131, K23 RR16539, K23RR016539)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
Keywords
diabetes self-management, goal setting, behavioral objectives, brief counseling intervention, telephone follow-up, diet, physical activity, problem solving, language and literacy, patient satisfaction, Spanish-speaking patients
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Counseling, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Feasibility Studies, Female, Goals, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self Care, Chi-Square Distribution, Patient Satisfaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review