Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 396

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Physician–patient–companion communication and decision-making: A systematic review of triadic medical consultations

Laidsaar-Powell, R.C., Butow, P.N., Bu, S., Charles, C., Gafni, A., Lam, W.W.T., Jansen, J., McCaffery, K.J., Shepherd, H.L., Tattersall, M.H.N., Juraskova, I.·2013·Patient Education and Counseling
DOI 10.1016/j.pec.2012.11.007
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pec.2012.11.007

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 55

  1. Wolff, 2008, Hidden in plain sight: medical visit companions as a resource for vulnerable older adults, Arch Intern Med, 168, 1409, 10.1001/archinte.168.13.1409 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Clayman, 2005, Autonomy-related behaviors of patient companions and their effect on decision-making activity in geriatric primary care visits, Soc Sci Med, 60, 1583, 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.08.004 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Beisecker, 1994, Oncologists’ perceptions of the effects of cancer patients’ companions on physician–patient interactions, J Psychosoc Oncol, 12, 23, 10.1300/J077V12N01_02 · DOI
  4. Kimberlin, 2004, Cancer patient and caregiver experiences: communication and pain management issues, J Pain Symptom Manage, 28, 566, 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2004.03.005 · DOI
  5. Mitnick, 2010, Family caregivers, patients and physicians: ethical guidance to optimize relationships, J Gen Intern Med, 25, 255, 10.1007/s11606-009-1206-3 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Speice, 2000, Involving family members in cancer care: focus group considerations of patients and oncological providers, Psychooncology, 9, 101, 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1611(200003/04)9:2<101::AID-PON435>3.0.CO;2-D · doi:10.1002/(sici)1099-1611(200003/04)9:2<101::aid-pon435>3.0.co;2-d
  7. Wolff, 2011, Family presence in routine medical visits: a meta-analytical review, Soc Sci Med, 72, 823, 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.01.015 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Lee, 2008, Self-management education programs for age-related macular degeneration: a systematic review, Aust J Ageing, 27, 170, 10.1111/j.1741-6612.2008.00298.x · DOI
  9. Street, 2008, Companion participation in cancer consultations, Psychooncology, 17, 244, 10.1002/pon.1225 · DOI
  10. Shields, 2005, Influence of accompanied encounters on patient-centeredness with older patients, J Am Board Fam Pract, 18, 344, 10.3122/jabfm.18.5.344 · DOI
  11. Ishikawa, 2006, Patients’ perceptions of visit companions’ helpfulness during Japanese geriatric medical visits, Patient Educ Couns, 61, 80, 10.1016/j.pec.2005.02.010 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Ishikawa, 2005, Physician–elderly patient–companion communication and roles of companions in Japanese geriatric encounters, Soc Sci Med, 60, 2307, 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.08.071 · DOI
  13. Ishikawa, 2005, Patient contribution to the medical dialogue and perceived patient-centeredness, J Gen Intern Med, 20, 906, 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.0200.x · DOI
  14. Greene, 1994, The effects of the presence of a third person on the physician–older patient medical interview, J Am Geriatr Soc, 42, 413, 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1994.tb07490.x · DOI · Paper page
  15. Eggly, 2006, Information seeking during “bad news” oncology interactions: question asking by patients and their companions, Soc Sci Med, 63, 2974, 10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.07.012 · DOI
  16. Beisecker, 1989, The influence of a companion on the doctor–elderly patient interaction, Health Commun, 1, 55, 10.1207/s15327027hc0101_7 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Baker, 1997, Laughter in triadic geriatric medical encounters: a transcript-based analysis, Soc Perspect Emotion, 4, 179
  18. Eggly, 2011, Variation in question asking during cancer clinical interactions: a potential source of disparities in access to information, Patient Educ Couns, 82, 63, 10.1016/j.pec.2010.04.008 · DOI
  19. Beisecker, 1988, Aging and the desire for information and input in medical decisions: patient consumerism in medical encounters, Gerontologist, 28, 330, 10.1093/geront/28.3.330 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Labrecque, 1991, The impact of family presence on the physician–cancer patient interaction, Soc Sci Med, 33, 1253, 10.1016/0277-9536(91)90073-L · DOI
  21. Botelho, 1996, Family involvement in routine health care: a survey of patients’ behaviors and preferences, J Fam Practice, 42, 572
  22. Brown, 1998, Roles and influence of people who accompany patients on visits to the doctor, Can Fam Phys, 44, 1644
  23. Schilling, 2002, The third person in the room: frequency, role, and influence of companions during primary care medical encounters, J Fam Pract, 51, 685
  24. Glasser, 2001, Elderly patients and their accompanying caregivers on medical visits, Res Aging, 23, 326, 10.1177/0164027501233003 · DOI
  25. Prohaska, 1996, Patients’ views of family involvement in medical care decisions and encounters, Res Aging, 18, 52, 10.1177/0164027596181004 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Glasser, 1992, The role of the family in medical careseeking decisions of older adults, Fam Community Health, 15, 59, 10.1097/00003727-199207000-00010 · doi:10.1097/00003727-199207000-00010
  27. Rosland, 2011, Family and friend participation in primary care visits of patients with diabetes or heart failure: patient and physician determinants and experiences, Med Care, 49, 37, 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181f37d28 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Silliman, 1996, The care of older persons with diabetes mellitus: families and primary care physicians, J Am Geriatr Soc, 44
  29. Srirangam, 2003, Partner's influence on patient preference for treatment in early prostate cancer, BJU Int, 92, 365, 10.1046/j.1464-410X.2003.04355.x · DOI
  30. Main, 2001, The effect of families on the process of outpatient visits in family practice, J Fam Pract, 50
  31. Barone, 1999, How physicians view caregivers: Simmel in the examination room, Soc Perspect, 42, 673, 10.2307/1389579 · DOI
  32. Petronio, 2004, Family and friends as healthcare advocates: dilemmas of confidentiality and privacy, J Soc Pers Relat, 21, 33, 10.1177/0265407504039838 · doi:10.1177/0265407504039838
  33. Beisecker, 1997, Perceptions of the role of cancer patients’ companions during medical appointments, J Psychosoc Oncol, 14, 29, 10.1300/J077v14n04_03 · doi:10.1300/j077v14n04_03
  34. Ellingson, 2002, The roles of companions in geriatric patient-interdisciplinary oncology team interactions, J Aging Stud, 16, 361, 10.1016/S0890-4065(02)00071-3 · DOI
  35. Repetto, 2009, Communicating cancer diagnosis and prognosis: when the target is the elderly patient – a GIOGer study, Eur J Cancer, 45, 374, 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.08.020 · DOI
  36. Huang, 1999, Attitudes and information needs of Chinese migrant cancer patients and their relatives, Aust N Z J Med, 29, 207, 10.1111/j.1445-5994.1999.tb00685.x · DOI
  37. Morris, 2001, The carer's place in the cancer situation: where does the carer stand in the medical setting?, Eur J Cancer Care, 10, 87, 10.1046/j.1365-2354.2001.00249.x · DOI
  38. Sinfield, 2008, Patient-centred care: what are the experiences of prostate cancer patients and their partners?, Patient Educ Couns, 73, 91, 10.1016/j.pec.2008.05.001 · DOI
  39. Boehmer, 2001, Married couples’ perspectives on prostate cancer diagnosis and treatment decision-making, Psychooncology, 10, 147, 10.1002/pon.504 · DOI
  40. Gilbar, 2009, The medical decision-making process and the family: the case of breast cancer patients and their husbands, Bioethics, 23, 183, 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00650.x · DOI
  41. Gonçalves, 2005, Breaking bad news: experiences and preferences of advanced cancer patients at a Portuguese oncology centre, Palliat Med, 19, 526, 10.1191/0269216305pm1070oa · DOI
  42. Hilton, 1994, Family decision-making processes about early stage breast cancer treatment, Can Oncol Nurs J, 4, 9, 10.5737/1181912x41916 · doi:10.5737/1181912x41916
  43. Hubbard, 2010, Treatment decision-making in cancer care: the role of the carer, J Clin Nurs, 19, 2023, 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03062.x · DOI
  44. Pardon, 2010, Preferences of patients with advanced lung cancer regarding the involvement of family and others in medical decision-making, J Palliative Med, 13, 1199, 10.1089/jpm.2010.0100 · DOI
  45. Philip, 2009, Patients’ views on decision making in advanced cancer, Palliative Support Care, 7, 181, 10.1017/S1478951509000236 · doi:10.1017/s1478951509000236
  46. Schäfer, 2006, Medical decision-making of the patient in the context of the family: results of a survey, Support Care Cancer, 14, 952, 10.1007/s00520-006-0025-x · DOI
  47. Shepherd, 2008, Physician-identified factors affecting patient participation in reaching treatment decisions, J Clin Oncol, 26, 1724, 10.1200/JCO.2007.13.5566 · DOI
  48. Stiggelbout, 2007, How important is the opinion of significant others to cancer patients’ adjuvant chemotherapy decision-making?, Support Care Cancer, 15, 319, 10.1007/s00520-006-0149-z · DOI
  49. Nolan, 2005, When patients lack capacity: the roles that patients with terminal diagnoses would choose for their physicians and loved ones in making medical decisions, J Pain Symptom Manage, 30, 342, 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2005.04.010 · DOI
  50. Sekimoto, 2004, Patients’ preferences for involvement in treatment decision making in Japan, BMC Fam Pract, 5, 1, 10.1186/1471-2296-5-1 · DOI · Paper page
  51. Gabbay, 2005, Negotiating end-of-life decision making: a comparison of Japanese and U.S. residents’ approaches, Acad Med, 80, 617, 10.1097/00001888-200507000-00003 · DOI
  52. Ito, 2010, Perceptions of Japanese patients and their family about medical treatment decisions, Nursing Health Sci, 12, 314, 10.1111/j.1442-2018.2010.00532.x · DOI
  53. Heyland, 2006, Understanding cardiopulmonary resuscitation decision making: perspectives of seriously ill hospitalized patients and family members, Chest, 130, 419, 10.1378/chest.130.2.419 · DOI · Paper page
  54. Coe, 1985, The formation of coalitions: interaction strategies in triads, Sociol Health Illn, 7, 236, 10.1111/1467-9566.ep10949087 · DOI
  55. Dalton, 2003, Development and testing of the theory of collaborative decision-making in nursing practice for triads, J Adv Nurs, 41, 22, 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02502.x · DOI

Cited by

See all 396

Metadata

Authors
Laidsaar-Powell, R. C., Butow, P. N., Bu, S., Charles, C., Gafni, A., Lam, W. W. T., Jansen, J., McCaffery, K. J., Shepherd, H. L., Tattersall, M. H. N., & Juraskova, I.
Venue
Patient Education and Counseling
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-04
Volume
91
Issue
1
Pages
3-13
ISSN
0738-3991 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.pec.2012.11.007
OpenAlex
W1976406066
Cited by
396
References
3
FWCI
3.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Funders
Informed Medical Decisions Foundation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.