Cited by 54Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care UnitsHospital Admissions and OutcomesPatient-Provider Communication in Healthcare

Engaging patients and families in communication across transitions of care: An integrative review

Open access
Bucknall, Tracey K., Hutchinson, Alison M., Botti, Mari, McTier, Lauren, Rawson, Helen, Hitch, Danielle, Hewitt, Nicky, Digby, Robin +5 more·2020·Patient Education and Counseling

Abstract

Objective To determine the current evidence about patient and family engagement in communication with health professionals during transitions of care to, within and from acute care settings. Methods An integrative review using seven international databases was conducted for 2003-2017. Forty eligible studies were analysed and synthesised using framework synthesis. Results Four themes: 1) Partnering in care: patients and families should be partners in decision-making and care; 2) Augmenting communication during transitions: intrinsic and extrinsic factors supported transition communication between patients, families and health professionals; 3) Impeding information exchange: the difficulties faced by patients and families taking an active role in transition; and 4) Outcomes of communication during transitions: reported experiences for patients, families and health professionals. Conclusion While attitudes towards engaging patients and family in transition communication in acute settings are generally positive, current practices are variable. Structural supports for practice are not always present. Practice implications Organisational strategies to improve communication must incorporate an understanding of patient needs. A structured approach which considers timing, privacy, location and appropriateness for patients and families is needed. Communication training is required for patients, families and health professionals. Health professionals must respect a patient's right to be…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pec.2020.01.017

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bucknall, T. K., Hutchinson, A. M., Botti, M., McTier, L., Rawson, H., Hitch, D., Hewitt, N., Digby, R., Fossum, M., McMurray, A., Marshall, A. P., Gillespie, B. M., & Chaboyer, W.
Affiliations
Deakin University (AU)
Corresponding author
Bucknall, Tracey K.
Venue
Patient Education and Counseling
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-06
Volume
103
Issue
6
Pages
1104-1117
ISSN
0738-3991 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3003675482
Cited by
54
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7
FWCI
1.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Patient Education and Counseling (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Radiological and Ultrasound Technology › Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Hospital Admissions and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
Keywords
patient engagement, family involvement, care transitions, patient-provider communication, shared decision-making, patient and family involvement, communication barriers, communication training, patient information rights, acute care settings
MeSH terms
Communication, Decision Making, Family, Health Personnel, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Patient Participation, Patient-Centered Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review