Cited by 37Palliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesPalliative and Oncologic CareHospital Admissions and Outcomes

Experiences of transitioning between settings of care from the perspectives of patients with advanced illness receiving specialist palliative care and their family caregivers: A qualitative interview study

Open access
Guo, Ping, Pinto, Cathryn, Edwards, Beth, Pask, Sophie, Firth, Alice, O’Brien, Suzanne, Murtagh, Fliss EM·2022·Palliative Medicine

Abstract

Background: Transitions between care settings (hospice, hospital and community) can be challenging for patients and family caregivers and are often an under-researched area of health care, including palliative care. Aim: To explore the experience of transitions between care settings for those receiving specialist palliative care. Design: Qualitative study using thematic analysis. Setting/participants: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with adult patients ( n = 15) and family caregivers ( n = 11) receiving specialist palliative care, who had undergone at least two transitions. Results: Four themes were identified. (1) Uncertainty about the new care setting. Most participants reported that lack of information about the new setting of care, and difficulties with access and availability of care in the new setting, added to feelings of uncertainty. (2) Biographical disruption. The transition to the new setting often resulted in changes to sense of independence and identity, and maintaining normality was a way to cope with this. (3) Importance of continuity of care. Continuity of care had an impact on feelings of safety in the new setting and influenced decisions about the transition. (4) Need for emotional and practical support. Most participants expressed a greater need for emotional and practical support, when transitioning to a new setting. Conclusions: Findings provide insights into how clinicians might better negotiate transitions for these patients and family caregivers, as well as improve patient outcomes. The complexity and diversity of transition experiences, particularly among patients and families from different ethnicities and cultural backgrounds, need to be further explored in future research.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/02692163211043371

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Guo, P., Pinto, C., Edwards, B., Pask, S., Firth, A., O’Brien, S., & Murtagh, F. E.
Affiliations
King's College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Guo, Ping
Venue
Palliative Medicine
Published
2021-09-03
Volume
36
Issue
1
Pages
124-134
ISSN
  • 0269-2163 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-030X
OpenAlex
W3198833130
Cited by
37
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 12
FWCI
4.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Palliative Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Repository@Hull (Worktribe) (University of Hull) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
national institute for health research (RP-PG-1210-12015)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Hospital Admissions and Outcomes
Keywords
specialist palliative care, advanced disease, family caregivers, uncertainty, biographical disruption, continuity of care, sense of normality, patient experience, hospital-to-home transition, hospice care
MeSH terms
Adult, Family, Hospices, Humans, Palliative Care, Caregivers, Hospice Care, Qualitative Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review