Psychometric properties of the Decisional Conflict Scale in a sample of perinatal women with depressive symptoms: A study in Portugal and Norway
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess the psychometric properties, i.e., reliability and construct validity of the 16-item Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS) and sub-scales in women with perinatal depressive symptoms in Norway and Portugal. METHODS: We included 415 women in Portugal and 163 in Norway (≥18 years) who were pregnant or had given birth in the last 12 months and presenting with active depressive symptoms. Women replied to the original DCS items. We conducted confirmatory factor analysis, estimated internal consistency reliability, and examined factorial invariance across country, perinatal status, and treatment uptake. RESULTS: The DCS factor model had good fit to the data, with all items loading significantly on their respective factor (.585 to .958). There was configural invariance of the DCS across countries, treatment, and perinatal status. The internal consistency of the total DCS (Cronbach's alpha) was .958, and for the subscales it ranged from .798 to .947. CONCLUSIONS: The DCS is a valid and reliable measure of the decisional conflict in women with perinatal depressive symptoms in Portugal and Norway. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Measuring the extent of decisional conflict regarding treatment and the effect of multiple interventions towards its reduction, is critical to facilitate the decision-making process of women with perinatal mental illness.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Many surrogates struggle to comprehend long-term implications, risks of complications, and potential withdrawal scenarios.
“Many surrogates struggle to comprehend long-term implications, risks of complications, and potential withdrawal scenarios16.”
From Decisional conflict among Chinese family caregivers prior to ECMO initiation: a cross-sectional study (2025) · cites this paper as [16]
Cites
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999) · Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1080/10705519909540118 · Cited by 108,788 · see citing works
Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit
Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1992) · Sociological Methods & Research · doi:10.1177/0049124192021002005 · Cited by 27,200 · see citing works
Detection of Postnatal Depression: Development of the 10-item Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale
Cox, J. L., Holden, J. M., & Sagovsky, R. (1987) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.150.6.782 · Cited by 14,183 · see citing works
Sensitivity of Goodness of Fit Indexes to Lack of Measurement Invariance
Chen, F. F. (2007) · Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1080/10705510701301834 · Cited by 12,217 · see citing works
Validation of a Decisional Conflict Scale
O'Connor, A. M. C. (1995) · Medical Decision Making · doi:10.1177/0272989x9501500105 · Cited by 2,462 · see citing works
A systematic review and meta-regression of the prevalence and incidence of perinatal depression
Woody, C. A., Ferrari, A. J., Siskind, D. J., Whiteford, H. A., & Harris, M. G. (2017) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2017.05.003 · Cited by 1,577 · see citing works
Medication use in pregnancy: a cross-sectional, multinational web-based study
Lupattelli, A., Spigset, O., Twigg, M., Zagorodnikova, K., Mårdby, A., Moretti, M., Drozd, M., Panchaud, A., Hämeen-Anttila, K., Rieutord, A., et al. (2014) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004365 · Cited by 435 · see citing works
Self-citationDubber, S., Reck, C., Müller, M., & Gawlik, S. (2015) · Archives of Women's Mental Health · doi:10.1007/s00737-014-0445-4 · Cited by 400 · see citing works
A review of longitudinal studies on antenatal and postnatal depression
Underwood, L., Waldie, K., D’Souza, S., Peterson, E. R., & Morton, S. (2016) · Archives of Women s Mental Health · doi:10.1007/s00737-016-0629-1 · Cited by 364 · see citing works
semPower: General power analysis for structural equation models
Moshagen, M., & Bader, M. (2023) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-023-02254-7 · Cited by 308 · see citing works
Putnam, K. T., Wilcox, M., Robertson‐Blackmore, E., Sharkey, K. M., Bergink, V., Munk‐Olsen, T., Deligiannidis, K. M., Payne, J. L., Altemus, M. M., Newport, D. J., et al. (2017) · The Lancet Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s2215-0366(17)30136-0 · Cited by 308 · see citing works
Comparative Incidence of Depression in Women and Men, During Pregnancy and after Childbirth
Areias, M. E., Kumar, R., Barros, H., & Figueiredo, E. (1996) · The British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.169.1.30 · Cited by 277 · see citing works
Petersen, I., Gilbert, R. E., Evans, S. J. W., Man, S.-L., & Nazareth, I. (2011) · The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry · doi:10.4088/jcp.10m06090blu · Cited by 192 · see citing works
Bert, F., Gualano, M. R., Brusaferro, S., Vito, E. D., de Waure, C., Torre, G. L., Manzoli, L., Messina, G., Todros, T., Torregrossa, M. V., et al. (2013) · Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health · doi:10.1136/jech-2013-202584 · Cited by 184 · see citing works
Decisional Conflict Scale Use over 20 Years: The Anniversary Review
Garvelink, M. M., Boland, L., Klein, K. A., Nguyen, D. V., Menear, M., Bekker, H., Eden, K., LeBlanc, A., O'Connor, A. M. C., Stacey, D., et al. (2019) · Medical Decision Making · doi:10.1177/0272989x19851345 · Cited by 182 · see citing works
The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale: Validation in a Norwegian community sample
Eberhard‐Gran, M., Eskild, A., Tambs, K., Schei, B., & Opjordsmoen, S. (2001) · Nordic Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1080/08039480151108525 · Cited by 178 · see citing works
Fallon, V., Davies, S. M., Silverio, S. A., Jackson, L., De Pascalis, L., & Harrold, J. A. (2021) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2021.01.048 · Cited by 158 · see citing works
Shakeel, N., Eberhard-Gran, M., Sletner, L., Slinning, K., Martinsen, E., Holme, I., & Jenum, A. (2015) · BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth · doi:10.1186/s12884-014-0420-0 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Petersen, I., McCrea, R. L., Sammon, C., Osborn, D., Evans, S. J. W., Cowen, P. J., Freemantle, N., & Nazareth, I. (2016) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta20230 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Seeking help for perinatal psychological distress: a meta-synthesis of women’s experiences
Button, S., Thornton, A., Lee, S., Shakespeare, J., & Ayers, S. (2017) · British Journal of General Practice · doi:10.3399/bjgp17x692549 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Decision making for depression treatment during pregnancy and the postpartum period
Patel, S. R., & Wisner, K. L. (2011) · Depression and Anxiety · doi:10.1002/da.20844 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Decisional conflict among women considering antidepressant medication use in pregnancy
Walton, G. D., Ross, L. E., Stewart, D. E., Grigoriadis, S., Dennis, C.-L., & Vigod, S. (2014) · Archives of Women's Mental Health · doi:10.1007/s00737-014-0448-1 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Lupattelli, A., Spigset, O., Björnsdóttir, I., Hämeen‐Anttila, K., MÅRDBY, A.-C. M., Panchaud, A., Juraški, R. G., Rudolf, G., Odalović, M., Drozd, M., et al. (2015) · Depression and Anxiety · doi:10.1002/da.22352 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Self-citationA patient decision aid for antidepressant use in pregnancy: Pilot randomized controlled trial
Vigod, S. N., Hussain-Shamsy, N., Stewart, D. E., Grigoriadis, S., Metcalfe, K., Oberlander, T. F., Schram, C., Taylor, V. H., & Dennis, C.-L. (2019) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2019.01.051 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Trinh, N. T., Munk‐Olsen, T., Wray, N. R., Bergink, V., Nordeng, H., Lupattelli, A., & Liu, X. (2023) · JAMA Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2023.0041 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Self-citationHarrison, S., QUIGLEY, M. A., Fellmeth, G. L., Stein, A. L., & Alderdice, F. A. (2023) · The Lancet Regional Health - Europe · doi:10.1016/j.lanepe.2023.100654 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Khalifeh, H., Molyneaux, E., Brauer, R., Vigod, S. N., & Howard, L. M. (2019) · BJGP Open · doi:10.3399/bjgpopen19x101666 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
van Gelder, M. M. H. J., Vorstenbosch, S., Winkel, B. T., van Puijenbroek, E., & Roeleveld, N. (2017) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/aje/kwx239 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Vigod, S. N., Hussain‐Shamsy, N., Grigoriadis, S., Howard, L. M., Metcalfe, K. A., Oberlander, T. F., Schram, C. A., Stewart, D. E., Taylor, V. H., & Dennis, C. (2016) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-016-1233-4 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Darwin, Z. J., Blower, S. L., Nekitsing, C., Masefield, S. C., Razaq, R., Padgett, L., Endacott, C., Willan, K., & Dickerson, J. (2022) · Frontiers in Global Women s Health · doi:10.3389/fgwh.2022.1028192 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Kittel‐Schneider, S., Felice, E., Buhagiar, R., den Berg, M. P. L., Wilson, C. A., Banjac, V., Vujović, K. S., Medić, B., Opanković, A., Fonseca, A., et al. (2022) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph19041973 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Self-citationEpidemiology of perinatal depression in Portugal: categorical and dimensional approach.
Maia, B., Marques, M., Bos, S. C., Pereira, A. T., Soares, M. J., Valente, J., Macedo, A., & de Azevedo, M. H. P. (2011) · PubMed · doi:10.20344/amp.1450 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Tauqeer, F., Moen, A., Myhr, K., Wilson, C. A., & Lupattelli, A. (2023) · Archives of Women s Mental Health · doi:10.1007/s00737-023-01341-0 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Self-citationBjørndal, L. D., Tauqeer, F., Heiervang, K. S., Clausen, H. K., Heitmann, K., & Lupattelli, A. (2022) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061159 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Self-citationFonseca, A., Branquinho, M., Monteiro, F., Araújo-Pedrosa, A., Bjørndal, L. D., & Lupattelli, A. (2023) · BJPsych Open · doi:10.1192/bjo.2023.56 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 36 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Xiao, S., Liu, H., Tang, L., Xiong, Q., Jiang, R., & Hong, D. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-28709-9 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Lupattelli, A., Branquinho, M., Cardoso, C., Tauqeer, F., Bjørndal, L. D., & Fonseca, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Oslo (NO)
- University of Coimbra (PT)
- Corresponding author
- Lupattelli, Angela
- ORCID
- Venue
- Patient Education and Counseling
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2024-10
- Volume
- 127
- Pages
- 108337
- ISSN
- 0738-3991 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4399040969
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 36
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1
- FWCI
- 0.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Patient Education and Counseling (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- FCT (SFRH/BD/145563/2019)
- Norges forskningsråd (288696)
- European Environment Agency
- EEA Grants and Norway Grants (FBR_0c1_70)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Social Sciences › Education › Health Education and Validation
- Keywords
- Decisional Conflict Scale, perinatal depression, decisional conflict, psychometric properties, construct validity, measurement invariance, internal consistency, perinatal mental disorders, treatment decision-making, pregnant and postpartum women
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Conflict, Psychological, Decision Making, Depression, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Humans, Norway, Portugal, Pregnancy, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Reproducibility of Results, Pregnant Women, Pregnant People
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review