Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 426

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 440 of the 440 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Machine learning technology in biodiesel research: A review

Open access
Aghbashlo, Mortaza, Peng, Wanxi, Tabatabaei, Meisam, Kalogirou, Soteris A., Soltanian, Salman, Hosseinzadeh-Bandbafha, Homa, Mahian, Omid, Lam, Su Shiung·2021·Progress in Energy and Combustion Science

Abstract

Abstract Biodiesel has the potential to significantly contribute to making transportation fuels more sustainable. Due to the complexity and nonlinearity of processes for biodiesel production and use, fast and accurate modeling tools are required for their design, optimization, monitoring, and control. Data-driven machine learning (ML) techniques have demonstrated superior predictive capability compared to conventional methods for modeling such highly complex processes. Among the available ML techniques, the artificial neural network (ANN) technology is the most widely used approach in biodiesel research. The ANN approach is a computational learning method that mimics the human brain's neurological processing ability to map input-output relationships of ill-defined systems. Given its high generalization capacity, ANN has gained popularity in dealing with complex nonlinear real-world engineering and scientific problems. This paper is devoted to thoroughly reviewing and critically discussing various ML technology applications, with a particular focus on ANN, to solve function approximation, optimization, monitoring, and control problems in biodiesel research. Moreover, the advantages and disadvantages of using ML technology in biodiesel research are highlighted to direct future RD however, these issues have rarely been explored in the literature. Therefore, future studies appear to be directed towards the use of ML techniques for real-time process monitoring and control of biodiesel systems to enhance production efficiency, economic viability, and environmental sustainability.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pecs.2021.100904

Cites

440 of 440 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 440 references

Cited by

See all 426

Metadata

Authors
Aghbashlo, M., Peng, W., Tabatabaei, M., Kalogirou, S. A., Soltanian, S., Hosseinzadeh-Bandbafha, H., Mahian, O., & Lam, S. S.
Venue
Progress in Energy and Combustion Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-07
Volume
85
Pages
100904
ISSN
0360-1285 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3136033096
Cited by
426
References
440
FWCI
21.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Machine learning technology in biodiesel research: A review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.pecs.2021.100904
The paper
Aghbashlo, M., Peng, W., Tabatabaei, M., Kalogirou, S. A., Soltanian, S., Hosseinzadeh-Bandbafha, H., Mahian, O., & Lam, S. S. (2021). Machine learning technology in biodiesel research: A review. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2021.100904

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.