Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 208

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Omega-3 fatty acids supplementation and oxidative stress parameters: A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials

Heshmati, Javad, Morvaridzadeh, Mojgan, Maroufizadeh, Saman, Akbari, Abolfazl, Yavari, Mahsa, Amirinejad, Ali, Maleki-Hajiagha, Arezoo, Sepidarkish, Mahdi·2019·Pharmacological Research

Abstract

Omega-3 fatty acids (omega-3 FAs) supplementation effects on oxidants and antioxidant are always controversial. Oxidative stress (OS) is one of the major mechanisms that contribute to the pathogenesis of several chronic diseases. The present systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to summarize the finding of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) examining the effects of omega-3 FAs on OS markers. Five databases including PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of science, and Cochrane were searched up to May 5th, 2019 with no language restriction. RCTs included if they compared OS indices among subjects who received omega-3 FAs supplements and subjects who supplemented with placebo. To estimate the effects of omega-3 FAs supplementation, standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were pooled using random effects model. Of 5,887 publications, 39 trials involving 2,875 participants were included for the meta-analysis. The pooled analysis of data indicated that omega-3 FAs significantly increased serum total antioxidant capacity (TAC) (SMD: 0.48 mmol/L, 95% CI: 0.23 to 0.72, P < 0.001, I2 = 60%), glutathione peroxidase (GPx) (SMD: 0.73 mmol/L, 95% CI: 0.30 to 1.16, P = 0.001, I2 = 83%) activity and decreased malondialdehyde (MDA) (SMD= -0.42 mmol/L; 95% CI: -0.62 to -0.21; P < 0.001; I2 = 74%) compared to the placebo group. However, the effects of omega-3 FAs on nitric oxide (NO) (SMD: -0.17 mmol/L, 95% CI: -0.77 to 0.43, P = 0.57, I2 = 91%), reduced glutathione (GSH) (SMD=0.23 mmol/L, 95% CI= -0.17 to 0.64, P = 0.25, I2 = 75%), superoxide dismutase (SOD) (0.12 mmol/L, 95% CI: -0.40 to 0.65, P = 0.64, I2 = 89%) and catalase (CAT) (0.16 mmol/L, 95% CI: -0.33, 0.65, P = 0.52, I2 = 75%,) activities was not significant. Supplementation with omega-3 FAs significantly improves MDA, TAC and GPx levels. Thus, omega-3 FAs can be mentioned as enhancer factors in antioxidant defense against reactive oxygen species (ROS).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.phrs.2019.104462

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 208

Metadata

Authors
Heshmati, J., Morvaridzadeh, M., Maroufizadeh, S., Akbari, A., Yavari, M., Amirinejad, A., Maleki-Hajiagha, A., & Sepidarkish, M.
Venue
Pharmacological Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-11
Volume
149
Pages
104462
ISSN
1043-6618 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2975185184
Cited by
208
References
5
FWCI
3.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Omega-3 fatty acids supplementation and oxidative stress parameters: A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.phrs.2019.104462
The paper
Heshmati, J., Morvaridzadeh, M., Maroufizadeh, S., Akbari, A., Yavari, M., Amirinejad, A., Maleki-Hajiagha, A., & Sepidarkish, M. (2019). Omega-3 fatty acids supplementation and oxidative stress parameters: A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials. Pharmacological Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phrs.2019.104462

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.