The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Antibacterial activity of Turkish propolis and its qualitative and quantitative chemical composition
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Recent trends and important developments in propolis research
Bankova, V. (2005) · Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine · doi:10.1093/ecam/neh059 · Cited by 569
Self-citationAdvances in the analysis of phenolic compounds in products derived from bees
Gómez-Caravaca, A. M., Gómez-Romero, M., Arráez-Román, D., Segura-Carretero, A., & Fernández-Gutiérrez, A. (2006) · Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.jpba.2006.03.002 · Cited by 441
Different extraction methods of biologically active components from propolis: a preliminary study
Trusheva, B., Trunkova, D., & Bankova, V. (2007) · Chemistry Central Journal · doi:10.1186/1752-153x-1-13 · Cited by 304
Self-citationPropolis and its potential against SARS-CoV-2 infection mechanisms and COVID-19 disease
Berretta, A. A., Silveira, M. A. D., Cóndor Capcha, J. M., & De Jong, D. (2020) · Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy · doi:10.1016/j.biopha.2020.110622 · Cited by 269
Velazquez, C., Navarro, M., Acosta, A., Angulo, A., Dominguez, Z., Robles, R., Robles-Zepeda, R., Lugo, E., Goycoolea, F. M., Velazquez, E. F., et al. (2007) · Journal of Applied Microbiology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2672.2007.03409.x · Cited by 163
Metadata
- Authors
- Popova, M., Silici, S., Kaftanoglu, O., & Bankova, V.
- Venue
- Phytomedicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2005-03
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 221-228
- ISSN
- 0944-7113 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2043835110
- Cited by
- 308
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Antibacterial activity of Turkish propolis and its qualitative and quantitative chemical composition. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.phymed.2003.09.007
- The paper
- Popova, M., Silici, S., Kaftanoglu, O., & Bankova, V. (2005). Antibacterial activity of Turkish propolis and its qualitative and quantitative chemical composition. Phytomedicine. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phymed.2003.09.007
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
