Cited by 68Medicinal Plants and Bioactive CompoundsMedicinal Plant Extracts EffectsMedicinal Plants and Neuroprotection

Double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised study of single dose effects of ADAPT-232 on cognitive functions

Aslanyan, G., Amroyan, E., Gabrielyan, E., Nylander, M., Wikman, G., Panossian, A.·2010·Phytomedicine

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the effect of a single dose of ADAPT-232 (a standardised fixed combination of Rhodiola rosea L., Schisandra chinensis (Turcz.) Baill., and Eleutherococcus senticosus Maxim) extracts on mental performance, such as attention, speed and accuracy, in tired individuals performing stressful cognitive tasks. The pilot study (phase IIa) clinical trial took the form of a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised, with two parallel groups. Forty healthy females aged between 20-68 years, who claimed to have felt stressed over a long period of time due to living under psychologically stressful conditions were selected to participate in the pilot study. In addition, a Stroop Colour-Word test (Stroop CW) was used to exhaust/prepare the volunteers prior to the d2 test used for assessment of cognitive function of patients. The participants were randomised into two groups, one (n=20) of which received a single tablet of ADAPT-232 (270mg), while a second (n=20) received a single tablet of placebo. The effects of the extract were measured prior to treatment and two hours after treatment using the d2 Test of Attention (d2). The results of the d2 test showed a significant difference (p<0.05) in attention, speed, and accuracy (TN-E scores) between the two treatment groups. The subjects in the ADAPT-232 group quickly (two hours after verum was taken) gained improved attention and increased speed and accuracy during stressful cognitive tasks, in comparison to placebo. There was also a tendency of ADAPT-232 to reduce percentage of errors, which means better accuracy, quality of the work, and degree of care in the volunteers under stressful conditions. No serious side effects were reported, although a few minor adverse events, such as sleepiness and cold extremities, were observed in both treatment groups.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.phymed.2010.02.005

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The intake of plant adaptogens is not associated with serious side effects.

    “The intake of plant adaptogens is not associated with serious side effects [20,21].”

    From Plant Adaptogens—History and Future Perspectives (2021) · cites this paper as [20]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Aslanyan, G., Amroyan, E., Gabrielyan, E., Nylander, M., Wikman, G., & Panossian, A.
Affiliations
  • National Institute of Health (AM)
  • Svenska Örtmedicinska Institute (SE)
Corresponding author
Panossian, A.
Venue
Phytomedicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-06
Volume
17
Issue
7
Pages
494-499
ISSN
0944-7113 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2069662196
Cited by
68
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Phytomedicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Medicinal Plants and Bioactive Compounds
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Medicinal Plant Extracts Effects
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Medicinal Plants and Neuroprotection
Keywords
Rhodiola rosea, Schisandra chinensis, Eleutherococcus senticosus, cognitive performance, attention, mental fatigue, psychological stress, D2 attention test, Stroop task, single-dose effects, healthy women
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Cognition, Double-Blind Method, Drug Combinations, Female, Fruit, Humans, Middle Aged, Pilot Projects, Plant Extracts, Stress, Psychological, Plant Roots, Eleutherococcus, Rhodiola, Schisandra, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review