Cited by 85Animal Behavior and Welfare StudiesStress Responses and CortisolAnimal testing and alternatives

Faecal corticosterone concentrations indicate that separately housed male mice are not more stressed than group housed males

Hunt, C., Hambly, C.·2006·Physiology & Behavior

Abstract

Mice account for over 80% of all animals used in experimentation. This study investigated how different housing conditions affected stress levels by measuring both corticosterone levels, using non-invasive faecal collection, and behaviour. Sixty outbred MF1 male mice were used which were separated into five different housing conditions at the beginning of the study, (A) individually housed, floor area 490 cm(2) per individual, (B) groups of three mice, floor area 163 cm(2) per individual, (C) groups of three mice, floor area 320 cm(2) per individual, (D) groups of six mice, floor area 160 cm(2) per individual, (E) groups of six mice, floor area 230 cm(2) with extra height per individual to allow visual contact. Mice in all housing conditions were provided with a basic enrichment of paper bedding and a plastic house. The results from this study showed that singly housed mice reduced their corticosterone levels over time after separation reaching a minimum from 14 days onwards. Groups of 6 mice housed together showed no difference over time. Also there was no significant difference in corticosterone levels between the different housing densities, with no differences for aggression or stereotypical behaviour suggesting that there is no ideal group density for this strain and sex of mouse. Providing additional enrichment to the cages caused a significant decrease in corticosterone levels for group housed mice, but individually housed mice remained unaffected by increasing their e…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.physbeh.2005.11.013

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ultrasonic vocalizations can reflect affective state or stress status continuously and noninvasively, making them preferable to other measures of stress or anxiety, such as fecal corticosterone, in rats.

    “One of the greatest benefits of USVs is their ability to reflect affective state or stress status continuously and noninvasively, making USVs preferable to other measures of stress or anxiety, such as fecal corticosterone, in rats.21,26,27,30”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hunt, C., & Hambly, C.
Corresponding author
Hambly, C.
Venue
Physiology & Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-03
Volume
87
Issue
3
Pages
519-526
ISSN
0031-9384 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2059644899
Cited by
85
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
8.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Physiology & Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal testing and alternatives
Keywords
housing conditions, social housing, single housing, group density, mouse welfare, stress, environmental enrichment, stereotypy, aggression, sleep behaviour
MeSH terms
Aggression, Animals, Corticosterone, Environment, Feces, Male, Radioimmunoassay, Social Isolation, Stereotyped Behavior, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review