Cited by 340Animal Behavior and Welfare StudiesAnimal testing and alternativesVeterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia

A new animal welfare concept based on allostasis

Open access
Korte, S. Mechiel, Olivier, Berend, Koolhaas, Jaap M.·2007·Physiology & Behavior

Abstract

Animal welfare is an increasing issue of public concern and debate. As a result, many countries are reconsidering the way animal welfare is embedded in the legislation and rules for housing and care of animals. This requires general agreement of what animal welfare is. Unfortunately, the current science of animal welfare is less scientific than what has been claimed. In our view, it is overly guided by anthropocentric thinking about how animals ought to be handled and neglects the latest concept of physiology: 'The Allostasis Concept'. Allostasis, which means stability through change, has the potential to replace homeostasis as the core model of physiological regulation. Not constancy or freedoms, but capacity to change is crucial to good physical and mental health and good animal welfare. Therefore, not homeostasis but allostasis is at the basis of our new animal welfare concept. This paper is aimed at a broader scientific discussion of animal welfare that includes knowledge from the latest scientific developments in neurobiology and behavioral physiology, and generates views that are extremely relevant for the animal welfare discussion.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.physbeh.2006.10.018

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Methods like allostatic load indexes are gaining attention because of their ability to capture cumulative stress, and so could potentially be used to predict mortality and morbidity risks.

    “Methods like allostatic load indexes are gaining attention because of their ability to capture cumulative stress (109), and so could potentially be used to predict mortality and morbidity risks.”

    From Comparison of animal welfare assessment tools and methodologies: need for an effective approach for captive elephants in Asia (2024) · cites this paper as [109]

    Section 2.3 describes allostatic load as a cumulative load on the brain and body, and section 3 proposes tissue damage as a measure of it. The paper therefore supports the cumulative-stress rationale, but these passages do not establish that allostatic load indexes are gaining attention. The mortality-and-morbidity prediction follows the citation in the citing sentence and is not treated as attributed to this source. (LLM, conf=0.79)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. McEwen B, Lasley EN. The end of stress ass we know it. New York: Joseph Henry Press; 2002.
  2. Rowe FP. Wild house mouse biology and control. Symp Zool Soc Lond 1981;47:575-89.
  3. Sterling P. In: Schulkin J, editor. Allostasis, homeostasis, and the costs of adaptation. Cambridge University Press; 2004. p. 17-64.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Korte, S. M., Olivier, B., & Koolhaas, J. M.
Affiliations
  • Utrecht University (NL)
  • University of Groningen (NL)
Corresponding author
Korte, S. Mechiel
Venue
Physiology & Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-10
Volume
92
Issue
3
Pages
422-428
ISSN
0031-9384 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2147688343
Cited by
340
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 22
FWCI
1.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physiology & Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion)
  • WBI Studies Repository (submittedVersion)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal testing and alternatives
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Veterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia
Keywords
animal welfare, allostasis, homeostasis, physiological regulation, animal welfare legislation, anthropocentrism, behavioral physiology
MeSH terms
Animals, Animal Welfare, Animals, Domestic, Behavior, Animal, Legislation, Veterinary, Allostasis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review