Mapping the contribution of single muscles to facial movements in the rhesus macaque
Open accessAbstract
The rhesus macaque (Macaca mulatta) is the most utilized primate model in the biomedical and psychological sciences. Expressive behavior is of interest to scientists studying these animals, both as a direct variable (modeling neuropsychiatric disease, where expressivity is a primary deficit), as an indirect measure of health and welfare, and also in order to understand the evolution of communication. Here, intramuscular electrical stimulation of facial muscles was conducted in the rhesus macaque in order to document the relative contribution of each muscle to the range of facial movements and to compare the expressive function of homologous muscles in humans, chimpanzees and macaques. Despite published accounts that monkeys possess less differentiated and less complex facial musculature, the majority of muscles previously identified in humans and chimpanzees were stimulated successfully in the rhesus macaque and caused similar appearance changes. These observations suggest that the facial muscular apparatus of the monkey has extensive homology to the human face. The muscles of the human face, therefore, do not represent a significant evolutionary departure from those of a monkey species. Thus, facial expressions can be compared between humans and rhesus macaques at the level of the facial musculature, facilitating the systematic investigation of comparative facial communication.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Homologous muscles have been documented in non-human primates.
“homologous muscles have been documented in non-human primates [27], [28], [29].”
From Survey on RGB, 3D, Thermal, and Multimodal Approaches for Facial Expression Recognition: History, Trends, and Affect-Related Applications (2016) · cites this paper as [29]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Facial-Expression and Gaze-Selective Responses in the Monkey Amygdala
Hoffman, K. L., Gothard, K. M., Schmid, M. C., & Logothetis, N. K. (2007) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2007.03.040 · Cited by 258 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Such images are often used as stimuli in experiments that assess the role of various brain regions in processing socioemotional stimuli such as facial expressions [21,22], and although facial expressions can be selected for these tasks based on common classification categories (threat face, lipsmack etc.”
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The integration of negative affect, pain and cognitive control in the cingulate cortex
Shackman, A. J., Salomons, T. V., Slagter, H. A., Fox, A. S., Winter, J. J., & Davidson, R. J. (2011) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2994 · Cited by 2,082 · see citing works
Corneanu, C. A., Simon, M. O., Cohn, J. F., & Guerrero, S. E. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2016.2515606 · Cited by 527 · see citing works
A comparative view of face perception.
Leopold, D. A., & Rhodes, G. (2010) · Journal of Comparative Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0019460 · Cited by 311 · see citing works
GibbonFACS: A Muscle-Based Facial Movement Coding System for Hylobatids
Waller, B. M., Lembeck, M., Kuchenbuch, P., Burrows, A. M., & Liebal, K. (2012) · International Journal of Primatology · doi:10.1007/s10764-012-9611-6 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
Self-citationVideos of conspecifics elicit interactive looking patterns and facial expressions in monkeys
Mosher, C. P., Zimmerman, P. E., & Gothard, K. M. (2011) · Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.1037/a0024264 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Waller, B. M., Parr, L. A., Gothard, K. M., Burrows, A. M., & Fuglevand, A. J.
- Affiliations
- University of Portsmouth (GB)
- Emory University (US)
- University of Arizona (US)
- Duquesne University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Waller, B.M.
- Venue
- Physiology & Behavior
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-09
- Volume
- 95
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 93-100
- ISSN
- 0031-9384 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC2637410
- OpenAlex
- W2007287624
- Cited by
- 56
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 2.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Physiology & Behavior (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Nottingham Trent University's Institutional Repository (Nottingham Trent Repository) (acceptedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- University of Portsmouth
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute of Mental Health (MH 070836, R01MH070836, R03MH082282)
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS-39489, R01NS039489)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
- Keywords
- facial muscles, facial expressions, rhesus monkeys, intramuscular electrical stimulation, evolution of communication
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Electric Stimulation, Facial Expression, Facial Muscles, Macaca mulatta, Male, Movement, Muscle Contraction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review