Cited by 56Face Recognition and PerceptionPrimate Behavior and EcologyEvolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior

Mapping the contribution of single muscles to facial movements in the rhesus macaque

Open access
Waller, B.M., Parr, L.A., Gothard, K.M., Burrows, A.M., Fuglevand, A.J.·2008·Physiology & Behavior

Abstract

The rhesus macaque (Macaca mulatta) is the most utilized primate model in the biomedical and psychological sciences. Expressive behavior is of interest to scientists studying these animals, both as a direct variable (modeling neuropsychiatric disease, where expressivity is a primary deficit), as an indirect measure of health and welfare, and also in order to understand the evolution of communication. Here, intramuscular electrical stimulation of facial muscles was conducted in the rhesus macaque in order to document the relative contribution of each muscle to the range of facial movements and to compare the expressive function of homologous muscles in humans, chimpanzees and macaques. Despite published accounts that monkeys possess less differentiated and less complex facial musculature, the majority of muscles previously identified in humans and chimpanzees were stimulated successfully in the rhesus macaque and caused similar appearance changes. These observations suggest that the facial muscular apparatus of the monkey has extensive homology to the human face. The muscles of the human face, therefore, do not represent a significant evolutionary departure from those of a monkey species. Thus, facial expressions can be compared between humans and rhesus macaques at the level of the facial musculature, facilitating the systematic investigation of comparative facial communication.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.physbeh.2008.05.002

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Waller, B. M., Parr, L. A., Gothard, K. M., Burrows, A. M., & Fuglevand, A. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Portsmouth (GB)
  • Emory University (US)
  • University of Arizona (US)
  • Duquesne University (US)
Corresponding author
Waller, B.M.
Venue
Physiology & Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-09
Volume
95
Issue
1-2
Pages
93-100
ISSN
0031-9384 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2007287624
Cited by
56
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 7
FWCI
2.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physiology & Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Nottingham Trent University's Institutional Repository (Nottingham Trent Repository) (acceptedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Portsmouth
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH 070836, R01MH070836, R03MH082282)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS-39489, R01NS039489)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
Keywords
facial muscles, facial expressions, rhesus monkeys, intramuscular electrical stimulation, evolution of communication
MeSH terms
Animals, Electric Stimulation, Facial Expression, Facial Muscles, Macaca mulatta, Male, Movement, Muscle Contraction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review