Cited by 311Face Recognition and PerceptionPrimate Behavior and EcologyEvolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior

A comparative view of face perception.

Open access
Leopold, David A., Rhodes, Gillian·2010·Journal of Comparative Psychology

Abstract

Face perception serves as the basis for much of human social exchange. Diverse information can be extracted about an individual from a single glance at their face, including their identity, emotional state, and direction of attention. Neuropsychological and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) experiments reveal a complex network of specialized areas in the human brain supporting these face-reading skills. Here we consider the evolutionary roots of human face perception by exploring the manner in which different animal species view and respond to faces. We focus on behavioral experiments collected from both primates and nonprimates, assessing the types of information that animals are able to extract from the faces of their conspecifics, human experimenters, and natural predators. These experiments reveal that faces are an important category of visual stimuli for animals in all major vertebrate taxa, possibly reflecting the early emergence of neural specialization for faces in vertebrate evolution. At the same time, some aspects of facial perception are only evident in primates and a few other social mammals, and may therefore have evolved to suit the needs of complex social communication. Because the human brain likely utilizes both primitive and recently evolved neural specializations for the processing of faces, comparative studies may hold the key to understanding how these parallel circuits emerged during human evolution.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0019460

Cites

304 of 304 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Species that have passed the mirror mark test are typically social species, which often need to visually recognize other individuals to maintain stable social groups.

    “These species that have passed the mirror mark test are typically social species (e.g., some birds, great apes, and elephants), which often need to visually recognize other individuals to maintain stable social groups (21, 39, 40).”

    From Cleaner fish recognize self in a mirror via self-face recognition like humans (2023) · cites this paper as [39]

    The Nonhuman primates, Mammals, and Vertebrates ‘Identity’ sections report mirror-mark self-recognition in great apes, elephants, and magpies, and describe visual recognition of other individuals in several species. They do not establish that species passing the mirror-mark test are typically social, or that visual recognition is needed to maintain stable social groups. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The ability to quickly and accurately differentiate between individual faces likely has an ancient evolutionary origin in humans and related species.

    “The ability to quickly and accurately differentiate between individual faces likely has an ancient evolutionary origin in humans and related species (1, 39, 40).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Allman JM 1977 Evolution of the visual system in early primates Sprague JM Epstein AN Progress in Psychobiology and Physiological Psychology 7 1 53 New York Academic Press
  2. Butler AB Hodos W 2005 Comparative vertebrate neuroanatomy Hoboken, NJ John Wiley and Sons
  3. Cornell HN Marzluff JM Peccorro S 2009 Individual and social learning enable american crows to discriminate dangerous from safe humans Animal Behaviour in press
  4. Coss RG Goldthwaite RO 1995 The persistence of old designs for perception Thompson NS Perspectives in Ethology 11: Behavioural Design New York Plenum Press
  5. Hödl W Amezquita A Ryan MJ 2001 Visual signaling in anuran amphibians Ryan MJ Anuran Communication 121 141 Washington, DC Smithsonian Institute Press
  6. Miklosi A 2007 Dog: behavior, evolution, and cognition Oxford, UK Oxford University Press
  7. Wyatt TD 2003 Pheromones and animal behavior: communication by smell and taste Cambridge, UK Cambridge University Press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Leopold, D. A., & Rhodes, G.
Affiliations
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • The University of Western Australia (AU)
Venue
Journal of Comparative Psychology
Published
2010
Volume
124
Issue
3
Pages
233-251
ISSN
  • 0093-4127 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2087
  • 0735-7036
OpenAlex
W2009439248
Cited by
311
References
304
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 5
FWCI
6.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of comparative psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health
  • National Eye Institute
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
  • Australian Research Council
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
Keywords
face perception, facial expression recognition, emotional expression, social communication, vertebrate evolution, social cognition
MeSH terms
Animals, Pan troglodytes, Discrimination, Psychological, Face, Humans, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Primates, Species Specificity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review