Human interaction moderates plasma cortisol and behavioral responses of dogs to shelter housing
Open accessAbstract
Housing in an animal shelter is a stressful experience for dogs. This study examined the effects of different forms of human interaction on concentrations of circulating cortisol and stress-related behaviors of dogs within 40 h of admittance to a county animal shelter. Blood samples were collected before and after 30-min sessions in a secluded area in which dogs received one of three forms of human interaction: exposure to a passive human, petting, or play. Controls were either exposed to the secluded area alone, or remained in the general housing area. There was a substantial and near uniform reduction in plasma cortisol concentrations from pretest to post-test in all three conditions receiving human interaction, but not in control conditions. Human interaction also reduced behavioral signs of excitation/social solicitation (vocalizing) and fear (panting). Finally, pretest cortisol levels were found to predict levels of panting and another fear-related behavior (tongue protrusions) that dogs exhibited during subsequent testing. The findings suggest practical means of reducing stress, and potentially of improving the welfare, of dogs in shelters.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Previous research in shelter dogs has demonstrated reductions in behavioral and physiological indicators of negative affect through provisions of positive human-animal interactions.
“While research to date has not specifically explored ways to reduce excessive arousal, previous research in shelter dogs has demonstrated reductions in behavioral (e.g., vocalizations, panting) and physiological (e.g., heart rate and cortisol) indicators of negative affect through provisions of positive human-animal interactions, such as petting sessions or physical exercise (4, 27–33).”
From Combined enrichment and pharmaceutical intervention reduces excessive arousal in shelter dogs in a randomized controlled trial (2026) · cites this paper as [30]
Prior research indicated reductions in vocalizations and panting in shelter dogs following 30 min of positive human-animal interaction (e.g., petting interactions).
“prior research has indicated reductions in vocalizations and panting in shelter dogs following 30 min of positive human-animal interaction (e.g., petting interactions) (30)”
From Combined enrichment and pharmaceutical intervention reduces excessive arousal in shelter dogs in a randomized controlled trial (2026) · cites this paper as [30]
These prior studies did not assess the influence of previous arousal-related behavior or temperament on outcomes.
“these studies did not assess the influence of previous arousal-related behavior or temperament on outcomes.”
From Combined enrichment and pharmaceutical intervention reduces excessive arousal in shelter dogs in a randomized controlled trial (2026) · cites this paper as [30]
Cites
Sapolsky, R. M., Romero, L. M., & Munck, A. U. (2000) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/edrv.21.1.0389 · Cited by 7,541 · see citing works
Chida, Y., & Hamer, M. (2008) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0013342 · Cited by 667 · see citing works
Manifestations of chronic and acute stress in dogs
Beerda, B., Schilder, M. B. H., van Hooff, J. A. R. A. M., & de Vries, H. W. (1997) · Applied Animal Behaviour Science · doi:10.1016/s0168-1591(96)01131-8 · Cited by 445 · see citing works
Metabolic consequences of stress during childhood and adolescence
Pervanidou, P., & Chrousos, G. P. (2012) · Metabolism · doi:10.1016/j.metabol.2011.10.005 · Cited by 316 · see citing works
Hennessy, M. B., T. Williams, M., Miller, D. D., Douglas, C. W., & Voith, V. L. (1998) · Applied Animal Behaviour Science · doi:10.1016/s0168-1591(98)00179-8 · Cited by 295 · see citing works
Self-citationTuber, D. S., Hennessy, M. B., Sanders, S., & Miller, J. A. (1996) · Journal of Comparative Psychology · doi:10.1037/0735-7036.110.1.103 · Cited by 209 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Cisneros, A., O’Hanley, K., Moody, C. M., & Stellato, A. C. (2026) · Frontiers in Veterinary Science · doi:10.3389/fvets.2026.1931203
- Authors
- Shiverdecker, M. D., Schiml, P. A., & Hennessy, M. B.
- Affiliations
- Wright State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Hennessy, Michael B.
- ORCID
- Hennessy, Michael B.
- Venue
- Physiology & Behavior
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-01
- Volume
- 109
- Pages
- 75-79
- ISSN
- 0031-9384 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2055541786
- Cited by
- 146
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 3
- FWCI
- 5.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- works.bepress.com
- Licence
- Locations
- Physiology & Behavior (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- CORE Scholar (Wright State University) (submittedVersion)
- Journal of Bioresource Management (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Human-Animal Interaction Studies
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
- Keywords
- dogs, animal shelters, human interaction, plasma cortisol, stress, petting, play, vocalizing, panting, tongue protrusion, dog welfare, stress behavior
- MeSH terms
- Analysis of Variance, Animals, Animal Welfare, Human-Animal Bond, Disease Models, Animal, Dogs, Fear, Female, Housing, Humans, Hydrocortisone, Male, Sex Factors, Stress, Psychological, Vocalization, Animal, Statistics, Nonparametric
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review