Cited by 146Human-Animal Interaction StudiesAnimal Behavior and Welfare StudiesStress Responses and Cortisol

Human interaction moderates plasma cortisol and behavioral responses of dogs to shelter housing

Open access
Shiverdecker, Matthew D., Schiml, Patricia A., Hennessy, Michael B.·2013·Physiology & Behavior

Abstract

Housing in an animal shelter is a stressful experience for dogs. This study examined the effects of different forms of human interaction on concentrations of circulating cortisol and stress-related behaviors of dogs within 40 h of admittance to a county animal shelter. Blood samples were collected before and after 30-min sessions in a secluded area in which dogs received one of three forms of human interaction: exposure to a passive human, petting, or play. Controls were either exposed to the secluded area alone, or remained in the general housing area. There was a substantial and near uniform reduction in plasma cortisol concentrations from pretest to post-test in all three conditions receiving human interaction, but not in control conditions. Human interaction also reduced behavioral signs of excitation/social solicitation (vocalizing) and fear (panting). Finally, pretest cortisol levels were found to predict levels of panting and another fear-related behavior (tongue protrusions) that dogs exhibited during subsequent testing. The findings suggest practical means of reducing stress, and potentially of improving the welfare, of dogs in shelters.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.physbeh.2012.12.002

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shiverdecker, M. D., Schiml, P. A., & Hennessy, M. B.
Affiliations
Wright State University (US)
Corresponding author
Hennessy, Michael B.
Venue
Physiology & Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-01
Volume
109
Pages
75-79
ISSN
0031-9384 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2055541786
Cited by
146
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 3
FWCI
5.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physiology & Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CORE Scholar (Wright State University) (submittedVersion)
  • Journal of Bioresource Management (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Human-Animal Interaction Studies
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
Keywords
dogs, animal shelters, human interaction, plasma cortisol, stress, petting, play, vocalizing, panting, tongue protrusion, dog welfare, stress behavior
MeSH terms
Analysis of Variance, Animals, Animal Welfare, Human-Animal Bond, Disease Models, Animal, Dogs, Fear, Female, Housing, Humans, Hydrocortisone, Male, Sex Factors, Stress, Psychological, Vocalization, Animal, Statistics, Nonparametric

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review