Cited by 7Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsPain Management and Treatment

Physiotherapy informed by acceptance and commitment therapy for persistent low back pain: the pact study

Critchley, D.J., McCracken, L.M., Talewar, R., Walker, N., Sanders, D., Godfrey, E.·2015·Physiotherapy

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.physio.2015.03.466

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Critchley, D. J., McCracken, L. M., Talewar, R., Walker, N., Sanders, D., & Godfrey, E.
Affiliations
  • King's College London (GB)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Critchley, D.J.
Venue
Physiotherapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-05
Volume
101
Pages
e277
ISSN
0031-9406 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2207308164
Cited by
7
References
0
Citations by year
2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
0.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Physiotherapy (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
Keywords
acceptance and commitment therapy, chronic low back pain, cognitive behavioral therapy, behavioral activation, goal setting, pain and disability, theory-based intervention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review