Cited by 13Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsHealth Policy Implementation Science

Physiotherapy informed by Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for chronic low back pain: A mixed‐methods treatment fidelity evaluation

Open access
Galea Holmes, Melissa N., Wileman, Vari, Hassan, Shaira, Denning, Julie, Critchley, Duncan, Norton, Sam, McCracken, Lance M., Godfrey, Emma·2022·British Journal of Health Psychology

Abstract

Objectives: A randomized controlled trial of a new type of Physiotherapy informed by Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (PACT), found that it improved functioning in people with chronic low back pain compared to usual physiotherapy care. Fidelity evaluation is necessary to understand trial processes and outcomes. This study evaluated PACT treatment fidelity including delivery, receipt, and enactment. Design: A mixed‐methods study nested within a randomized controlled trial was conducted. Methods: A total of 72 (20% of total) PACT treatment audio files were independently assessed by two raters, according to a novel framework developed to measure PACT treatment content adherence, therapeutic alliance, ACT competence, and treatment enactment. Interview transcripts from 19 trial participants randomized to PACT were analysed thematically for evidence of treatment receipt and enactment. Results: PACT physiotherapists delivered treatment as intended with high content adherence and satisfactory therapeutic alliance, but ACT competence was low. Qualitative findings indicated participant receipt of 11/17 and enactment of 3/17 components; 89% ( n = 17) and 47% ( n = 9) of participants reported treatment receipt and enactment of at least one component, respectively. Conclusions: This mixed‐methods study of PACT treatment demonstrated high fidelity reflecting treatment content delivery and receipt, and therapeutic alliance. There was some evidence of treatment enactment in participants with chronic low back pain. Low ACT competence could be addressed through additional support and adaptations to therapeutic processes for delivery by physiotherapists.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/bjhp.12583

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The compliance rate is higher than that in a study of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for cancer survivors (70%) but lower than that in a study of chronic lower back pain (80%).

    “However, it is higher compared to a study investigating Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for cancer survivors (70%), 12 but lower than a study examining this therapy for people with chronic lower back pain (80%). 13”

    From Acceptance and Commitment Therapy is feasible for people with acquired brain injury: A process evaluation of the BrainACT treatment. (2024) · cites this paper as [13]

    The Results section on PACT intervention content uses 80% as a threshold for treatment-delivery fidelity, not as a patient compliance rate. The Abstract’s Results instead report that 89% of participants received at least one component and 47% enacted at least one; neither is an 80% compliance rate for people with chronic low back pain. No page number is provided in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. George, D., & Mallery, P. (2003). Using SPSS for Windows Step by Step: A Simple Guide and Reference (4th ed). London: Pearson Education.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Galea Holmes, M. N., Wileman, V., Hassan, S., Denning, J., Critchley, D., Norton, S., McCracken, L. M., & Godfrey, E.
Affiliations
  • Health Psychology Section Department of Psychology Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience (IoPPN) King's College London UK
  • King's College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Wileman, Vari
Venue
British Journal of Health Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2022-02-03
Volume
27
Issue
3
Pages
935-955
ISSN
  • 1359-107X (ISSN-L)
  • 2044-8287
OpenAlex
W4210735840
Cited by
13
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1
FWCI
1.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal of Health Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Uppsala University Publications (Uppsala University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Queen Mary Research Online (Queen Mary University of London) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Research for Patient Benefit Programme (PB‐PG‐1112‐29055)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
Keywords
physiotherapy, acceptance and commitment therapy, chronic low back pain, intervention fidelity, therapeutic relationship, treatment receipt
MeSH terms
Humans, Low Back Pain, Physical Therapy Modalities, Chronic Pain, Physical Therapists, Acceptance and Commitment Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review