Non-parametric reconstruction of an inflaton potential from Einstein–Cartan–Sciama–Kibble gravity with particle production
Open accessAbstract
The coupling between spin and torsion in the Einstein–Cartan–Sciama–Kibble theory of gravity generates gravitational repulsion at very high densities, which prevents a singularity in a black hole and may create there a new universe. We show that quantum particle production in such a universe near the last bounce, which represents the Big Bang, gives the dynamics that solves the horizon, flatness, and homogeneity problems in cosmology. For a particular range of the particle production coefficient, we obtain a nearly constant Hubble parameter that gives an exponential expansion of the universe with more than 60 e-folds, which lasts about ∼10−42s. This scenario can thus explain cosmic inflation without requiring a fundamental scalar field and reheating. From the obtained time dependence of the scale factor, we follow the prescription of Ellis and Madsen to reconstruct in a non-parametric way a scalar field potential which gives the same dynamics of the early universe. This potential gives the slow-roll parameters of cosmic inflation, from which we calculate the tensor-to-scalar ratio, the scalar spectral index of density perturbations, and its running as functions of the production coefficient. We find that these quantities do not significantly depend on the scale factor at the Big Bounce. Our predictions for these quantities are consistent with the Planck 2015 observations.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The same behavior is obtained if we consider the dynamics of a universe with a given value of a_min and T_max given by Equation (20) as the initial conditions for expansion.
“The same behavior is obtained if we consider the dynamics of a universe with a given value of a min and T max given by Equation (20) as the initial conditions for expansion (Desai & Popławski 2016).”
From UNIVERSE IN A BLACK HOLE IN EINSTEIN–CARTAN GRAVITY (2016) · cites this paper as Desai & Popławski 2016
Section 3 (Inflationary dynamics) models expansion from a minimum scale factor with an initial temperature near the maximum and reports an inflationary phase. It uses T₀ = 0.99Tmax, not Tmax itself, and specifies a particle-production coefficient β; the claimed initial conditions omit those qualifications. Equation (20) is not the equation number used for Tmax in this source. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe consistency, for a particular range of the production rate, was recently found in Desai & Popławski (2016).
“The consistency, for a particular range of the production rate, was recently found in Desai & Popławski (2016).”
From UNIVERSE IN A BLACK HOLE IN EINSTEIN–CARTAN GRAVITY (2016) · cites this paper as Desai & Popławski 2016
Numerical analysis of this scenario showed that the dynamics of the universe is insensitive to the value of a_i, and thus to that of a_min, and effectively depends on the particle production coefficient β only.
“Numerical analysis of this scenario (Desai & Popławski 2016) showed that the dynamics of the universe is insensitive to the value of a i , and thus to that of a min , and effectively depends on the particle production coefficient β only.”
From UNIVERSE IN A BLACK HOLE IN EINSTEIN–CARTAN GRAVITY (2016) · cites this paper as Desai & Popławski 2016
This behavior as a function of β was confirmed numerically in Desai & Popławski (2016).
“This behavior as a function of β was confirmed numerically in Desai & Popławski (2016).”
From UNIVERSE IN A BLACK HOLE IN EINSTEIN–CARTAN GRAVITY (2016) · cites this paper as Desai & Popławski 2016
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
First-order phase transition of a vacuum and the expansion of the Universe
Sato, K. (1981) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/195.3.467 · Cited by 1,792 · see citing works
Dynamics of the universe and spontaneous symmetry breaking
Kazanas, D. (1980) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/183361 · Cited by 614 · see citing works
How long before the end of inflation were observable perturbations produced?
Liddle, A. R., & Leach, S. M. (2003) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.68.103503 · Cited by 607 · see citing works
Cosmology with torsion: An alternative to cosmic inflation
Popławski, N. J. (2010) · Physics Letters B · doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2010.09.056 · Cited by 205 · see citing works
Self-citationNonsingular, big-bounce cosmology from spinor-torsion coupling
Popławski, N. (2012) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.85.107502 · Cited by 180 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- R.H. Dicke, P.J.E. Peebles, in: S.W. Hawking, W. Israel (Eds.), General Relativity: An Einstein Centenary Survey, Cambridge University Press, 1979, p. 504.
- P.A.R. Ade, et al., arXiv:1502.02114, 2015. · arXiv
- N.J. Popławski, arXiv:0911.0334, 2009. · arXiv
- N. Popławski, arXiv:1304.0047, 2013. · arXiv
- N.J. Popławski, arXiv:1410.3881, 2014. · arXiv
- T. Watanabe, arXiv:0902.1392, 2009. · arXiv
- W.H. Kinney, arXiv:0902.1529, 2009. · arXiv
- P.A.R. Ade, et al., arXiv:1502.01589, 2015. · arXiv
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Testing general relativity in cosmology
Ishak, M. (2019) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.1007/s41114-018-0017-4 · Cited by 449 · see citing works
UNIVERSE IN A BLACK HOLE IN EINSTEIN–CARTAN GRAVITY
Popławski, N. (2016) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/0004-637x/832/2/96 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Self-citationA nonsingular, anisotropic universe in a black hole with torsion and particle production
Popławski, N. J. (2021) · General Relativity and Gravitation · doi:10.1007/s10714-021-02790-7 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Desai, S., & Popławski, N. J.
- Affiliations
- Excellence Cluster Universe (DE)
- University of New Haven (US)
- Corresponding author
- Desai, Shantanu
- Venue
- Physics Letters B
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-04
- Volume
- 755
- Pages
- 183-189
- ISSN
- 0370-2693 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2243425269
- Cited by
- 27
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4
- FWCI
- 2.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- Physics Letters B (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- Digital Commons - New Heaven (University of New Haven) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
- Keywords
- Einstein-Cartan theory, torsion, spin-torsion coupling, cosmic inflation, slow-roll parameters, tensor-to-scalar ratio, scalar spectral index, running of the spectral index, Big Bounce, black hole singularity resolution, horizon problem, flatness problem, non-parametric reconstruction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review