The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Heating decreases epithiospecifier protein activity and increases sulforaphane formation in broccoli
Abstract
Sulforaphane, an isothiocyanate from broccoli, is one of the most potent food-derived anticarcinogens. This compound is not present in the intact vegetable, rather it is formed from its glucosinolate precursor, glucoraphanin, by the action of myrosinase, a thioglucosidase enzyme, when broccoli tissue is crushed or chewed. However, a number of studies have demonstrated that sulforaphane yield from glucoraphanin is low, and that a non-bioactive nitrile analog, sulforaphane nitrile, is the primary hydrolysis product when plant tissue is crushed at room temperature. Recent evidence suggests that in Arabidopsis, nitrile formation from glucosinolates is controlled by a heat-sensitive protein, epithiospecifier protein (ESP), a non-catalytic cofactor of myrosinase. Our objectives were to examine the effects of heating broccoli florets and sprouts on sulforaphane and sulforaphane nitrile formation, to determine if broccoli contains ESP activity, then to correlate heat-dependent changes in ESP activity, sulforaphane content and bioactivity, as measured by induction of the phase II detoxification enzyme quinone reductase (QR) in cell culture. Heating fresh broccoli florets or broccoli sprouts to 60 degrees C prior to homogenization simultaneously increased sulforaphane formation and decreased sulforaphane nitrile formation. A significant loss of ESP activity paralleled the decrease in sulforaphane nitrile formation. Heating to 70 degrees C and above decreased the formation of both products in broccoli florets, but not in broccoli sprouts. The induction of QR in cultured mouse hepatoma Hepa lclc7 cells paralleled increases in sulforaphane formation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The enzymic and chemically induced decomposition of glucosinolates
BONES, A., & ROSSITER, J. (2006) · Phytochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.phytochem.2006.02.024 · Cited by 587
Glucosinolates, isothiocyanates and human health
Traka, M., & Mithen, R. (2009) · Phytochemistry Reviews · doi:10.1007/s11101-008-9103-7 · Cited by 490
Bioavailability of Glucosinolates and Their Breakdown Products: Impact of Processing
Barba, F. J., Nikmaram, N., Roohinejad, S., Khelfa, A., Zhu, Z., & Koubaa, M. (2016) · Frontiers in Nutrition · doi:10.3389/fnut.2016.00024 · Cited by 336
Isothiocyanate from Broccoli, Sulforaphane, and Its Properties
Vanduchova, A., Anzenbacher, P., & Anzenbacherova, E. (2019) · Journal of Medicinal Food · doi:10.1089/jmf.2018.0024 · Cited by 322
Health benefits and possible risks of broccoli – An overview
Latté, K. P., Appel, K.-E., & Lampen, A. (2011) · Food and Chemical Toxicology · doi:10.1016/j.fct.2011.08.019 · Cited by 266
Metadata
- Authors
- Matusheski, N. V., Juvik, J. A., & Jeffery, E. H.
- Venue
- Phytochemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2004-05
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1273-1281
- ISSN
- 0031-9422 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2099597187
- Cited by
- 302
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Heating decreases epithiospecifier protein activity and increases sulforaphane formation in broccoli. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.phytochem.2004.04.013
- The paper
- Matusheski, N. V., Juvik, J. A., & Jeffery, E. H. (2004). Heating decreases epithiospecifier protein activity and increases sulforaphane formation in broccoli. Phytochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phytochem.2004.04.013
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.