Cited by 35Pregnancy and preeclampsia studiesBirth, Development, and HealthMaternal and Perinatal Health Interventions

The relationship between human placental morphometry and ultrasonic measurements of utero-placental blood flow and fetal growth

Open access
Salavati, N., Sovio, U., Mayo, R. Plitman, Charnock-Jones, D.S., Smith, G.C.S.·2016·Placenta

Abstract

Introduction Ultrasonic fetal biometry and arterial Doppler flow velocimetry are widely used to assess the risk of pregnancy complications. There is an extensive literature on the relationship between pregnancy outcomes and the size and shape of the placenta. However, ultrasonic fetal biometry and arterial Doppler flow velocimetry have not previously been studied in relation to postnatal placental morphometry in detail.Methods We conducted a prospective cohort study of nulliparous women in The Rosie Hospital, Cambridge (UK). We studied a group of 2120 women who had complete data on uterine and umbilical Doppler velocimetry and fetal biometry at 20, 28 and 36 weeks' gestational age, digital images of the placenta available, and delivered a liveborn infant at term. Associations were expressed as the difference in the standard deviation (SD) score of the gestational age adjusted ultrasound measurement (z-score) comparing the lowest and highest decile of the given placental morphometric measurement.Results The lowest decile of placental surface area was associated with 0.87 SD higher uterine artery Doppler mean pulsatility index (PI) at 20 weeks (95% CI: 0.68 to 1.07, P < 0.001). The lowest decile of placental weight was associated with 0.73 SD higher umbilical artery Doppler PI at 36 weeks (95% CI: 0.54 to 0.93, P < 0.001). The lowest decile of both placental weight and placental area were associated with reduced growth velocity of the fetal abdominal circumference between 20 and 36 weeks (both P < 0.001).Conclusion Placental area and weight are associated with uterine and umbilical blood flow, respectively, and both are associated with fetal growth rate.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.placenta.2015.12.003

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Placental surface area was found to be inversely related to ultrasound measurements of umbilical arterial resistance in a prospective cohort of nulliparous pregnancies.

    “With regards to the latter, placental surface area was found to be inversely related to ultrasound measurements of umbilical arterial resistance in a prospective cohort of nulliparous pregnancies (481).”

    From Placental Origins of Chronic Disease (2016) · cites this paper as [481]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Burton GJ, Jauniaux E. The maternal circulation and placental shape: villus remodelling induced through haemodynamics and oxidative and endoplasmic reticulum stress In: Burton GJ, Barker DJP, Moffett A, Thornburg K, editors. The Placenta and Human Developmental Programming. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010. p. 161-74.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Salavati, N., Sovio, U., Mayo, R. P., Charnock-Jones, D. S., & Smith, G. C. S.
Affiliations
  • University Medical Center Groningen (NL)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
Corresponding author
Smith, G.C.S.
Venue
Placenta
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-02
Volume
38
Pages
41-48
ISSN
0143-4004 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2189842546
Cited by
35
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4
FWCI
4.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Placenta (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (publishedVersion)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (acceptedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute for Health and Care Research (A019057)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Birth, Development, and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
Keywords
placental morphometry, placental surface area, placental weight, uteroplacental blood flow, uterine artery Doppler, umbilical artery Doppler, pulsatility index, fetal growth rate, fetal abdominal circumference, fetal biometry, nulliparous women, pregnancy complications
MeSH terms
Blood Flow Velocity, Female, Gestational Age, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Maternal-Fetal Exchange, Organ Size, Placenta, Pregnancy, Umbilical Arteries, Cohort Studies, Ultrasonography, Prenatal, Fetal Development, Uterine Artery

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review