The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Chromium (VI) induces toxicity at different photosynthetic levels in pea
Open accessAbstract
In order to comprehensively characterize the effects of Cr (VI) on the photosynthetic performance of Pisum sativum, plants irrigated with Cr solutions (ranging from 20 to 2000 mg l(-1)) were evaluated using the following classical endpoints: gas exchange parameters, chlorophyll a (Chl a) fluorescence, leaf pigments, Rubisco activity, soluble sugars and starch content. Flow cytometry (FCM) was applied in an innovative approach to evaluate the morphological and fluorescence emission status of chloroplasts from plants exposed to Cr (VI). The parameters related to gas exchange, net CO(2) assimilation rate (A) and Rubisco activity were severally affected by Cr exposure, in some cases even at the lowest dosage used. While all biomarkers used to measure Chl a fluorescence indicated a decrease in fluorescence at the maximum dosage, pigment contents significantly increased in response to Cr (VI). The morphology of chloroplasts also was altered by Cr (VI) exposure, as a volume decrease was observed. Soluble sugars and starch showed an overall tendency to increase in Cr (VI) exposed plants, but sucrose and glucose decreased highly when exposed to 2000 mg l(-1). In conclusion, our results indicate that Cr (VI) affects photosynthesis at several levels, but the most Cr (VI)-sensitive endpoints were chloroplast morphology and biochemical processes; only at higher dosages the photochemical efficiency is compromised.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
SUGAR SENSING AND SIGNALING IN PLANTS: Conserved and Novel Mechanisms
Rolland, F., Baena-Gonzalez, E., & Sheen, J. (2006) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.57.032905.105441 · Cited by 2,328
Cited by
Prasad, S., Yadav, K. K., Kumar, S., Gupta, N., Cabral-Pinto, M. M. S., Rezania, S., Radwan, N., & Alam, J. (2021) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112174 · Cited by 744
Chromium as an Environmental Pollutant: Insights on Induced Plant Toxicity
Oliveira, H. (2012) · Journal of Botany · doi:10.1155/2012/375843 · Cited by 587
Interactions between plant hormones and heavy metals responses
Bücker-Neto, L., Paiva, A. L. S., Machado, R. D., Arenhart, R. A., & Margis-Pinheiro, M. (2017) · Genetics and Molecular Biology · doi:10.1590/1678-4685-gmb-2016-0087 · Cited by 454
Pratush, A., Kumar, A., & Hu, Z. (2018) · International Microbiology · doi:10.1007/s10123-018-0012-3 · Cited by 399
Ao, M., Chen, X., Deng, T., Sun, S., Tang, Y., Morel, J. L., Qiu, R., & Wang, S. (2022) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.127233 · Cited by 279
Metadata
- Authors
- Rodriguez, E., Santos, C., Azevedo, R., Moutinho-Pereira, J., Correia, C., & Dias, M. C.
- Venue
- Plant Physiology and Biochemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-04
- Volume
- 53
- Pages
- 94-100
- ISSN
- 0981-9428 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1980118727
- Cited by
- 166
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Chromium (VI) induces toxicity at different photosynthetic levels in pea. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.plaphy.2012.01.013
- The paper
- Rodriguez, E., Santos, C., Azevedo, R., Moutinho-Pereira, J., Correia, C., & Dias, M. C. (2012). Chromium (VI) induces toxicity at different photosynthetic levels in pea. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2012.01.013
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.