Cited by 14Acute Ischemic Stroke ManagementCardiovascular Health and Risk FactorsHealth Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention

Stroke related knowledge, prevention practices and associated factors among stroke patients in Taizhou, China

Open access
Liang, Junbo, Luo, Chengwen, Ke, Shaofa, Tung, Tao-Hsin·2023·Preventive Medicine Reports

Abstract

Stroke is characterized by high morbidity, high mortality and high disability rate, which is a major health problem worldwide. However, most community-based studies report a lack of public knowledge related to stroke. The aim of this study is to investigate stroke-related knowledge and prevention practices among stroke patients in Taizhou, China. A face-to-face survey was conducted and questionnaires were completed by 156 S patients from June 27 to August 30, 2022. A generalized linear model was applied to explore the factors influencing prevention practices. Among the total participants, 36.5% and 40.4% of them had good knowledge of the stroke-related warning signs and risk factors, respectively. Participants who had good stroke prevention practices accounted for 57.7%. The higher score of stroke-related knowledge among inpatients, the better their prevention practices (B = 0.16, 95 %CI: 0.05 ∼ 0.28). In addition, those with age ≥ 60 (B = 1.20, 95 %CI: 0.42 ∼ 1.97), females (B = 0.93, 95 %CI: 0.24 ∼ 1.61), having physical activities (B = 1.01, 95 %CI: 0.33 ∼ 1.68), or without underlying diseases (B = -1.67, 95 %CI:-2.42 ∼ -0.92) were also related with prevention practices. In general, this survey indicated that the stroke-related knowledge and prevention practices of participants were not good enough. Stroke related knowledge, age, sex, physical activity, and underlying disease were significant factors related to stroke prevention practices. These findings suggest the need to focus on stroke health education for stroke patients.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pmedr.2023.102340

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • 59.6% of stroke patients did not know the risk factors associated with stroke.

    “It was found that only 36.5% of stroke patients had knowledge of stroke-related warning signs and symptoms, and 59.6% did not know the risk factors associated with stroke (Liang et al. 2023).”

    From The Relationship Between Knowledge, Psychological Flexibility, Anxiety and Healthy Behaviour in Stroke Patients: A Chain Mediation Model. (2026) · cites this paper as Liang et al. 2023

    Table 3 (Results, Knowledge of stroke risk factors) classifies 59.6% of the 156 patients as having *poor* knowledge of stroke risk factors, not as knowing none of them; many identified individual risk factors. Table 2 (Results, Knowledge of stroke warning signs or symptoms) supports the sentence’s separate 36.5% figure for good knowledge of warning signs. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Only 36.5% of stroke patients had knowledge of stroke-related warning signs and symptoms.

    “It was found that only 36.5% of stroke patients had knowledge of stroke-related warning signs and symptoms, and 59.6% did not know the risk factors associated with stroke (Liang et al. 2023).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Campbell B.C.V. Khatri P. Stroke Lancet 396 10244 2020 129 142 32653056

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liang, J., Luo, C., Ke, S., & Tung, T.-H.
Affiliations
Wenzhou Medical University (CN)
Corresponding author
Tung, Tao-Hsin
Venue
Preventive Medicine Reports
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-10
Volume
35
Pages
102340
ISSN
2211-3355 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4384938682
Cited by
14
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1
FWCI
2.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Preventive Medicine Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention
Keywords
stroke, stroke knowledge, stroke risk factors, stroke warning signs, stroke patients, physical activity, underlying disease, sex differences, age, Taizhou

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review