Cited by 62Cultural Competency in Health CarePain Management and Opioid UseSex and Gender in Healthcare

The influence of race and gender on pain management: a systematic literature review

Open access
Hampton, Sharon B., Cavalier, James, Langford, Rae·2015·Pain Management Nursing

Abstract

Racial and gender disparities in health are well documented in health science literature. Racial minorities and women are known to receive disproportionately poorer quality of health care when compared to non-Hispanic Whites. It is unknown why women and particular racial and ethnic minorities are more susceptible to experience disparities in patient care. Moreover, with pain being the most common complaint for those entering the healthcare system, gaps in understanding the potential relationship between the nurse provider's gender and/or race and ethnicity and pain management deserve exploration. A systematic literature review has been conducted to explore the current state of knowledge related to providers, health disparities, and pain. Much of the research to date has focused on the provider-patient relationship to health disparities in pain management. Further research is needed to examine how provider-patient interactions may influence patient outcomes, satisfaction, adherence and disparities in health.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pmn.2015.06.009

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A handful of studies suggest that the working alliance statistically mediates the positive effects of rehabilitative treatments in people with musculoskeletal pain.

    “A handful of studies suggest that an index of the therapeutic relationship (i.e., the working alliance) statistically mediates the positive effects of rehabilitative treatments among people with musculoskeletal pain 141–145.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hampton, S. B., Cavalier, J., & Langford, R.
Affiliations
Texas Woman's University (US)
Corresponding author
Hampton, Sharon B.
Venue
Pain Management Nursing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-12
Volume
16
Issue
6
Pages
968-977
ISSN
1524-9042 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2213331499
Cited by
62
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3
FWCI
2.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Pain Management Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Cultural Competency in Health Care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Sex and Gender in Healthcare
Keywords
racial disparities, gender disparities, pain management, health disparities, racial and ethnic minorities, women, provider-patient relationship, quality of care, patient satisfaction, medication adherence
MeSH terms
Canada, Ethnicity, Female, Humans, Male, Pain, Sex Factors, Socioeconomic Factors, United States, Pain Management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review