Cited by 91Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome ResearchFunctional Brain Connectivity StudiesSleep and Work-Related Fatigue

Functional neuroimaging of fatigue

DeLuca, John, Genova, Helen M., Capili, Emlyn J., Wylie, Glenn R.·2009·Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics of North America

Abstract

Clearly, the use of functional neuroimaging for the study of fatigue is in its infancy. Relatively few studies focusing on fatigue using functional neuroimaging techniques have been published, and the few that exist focus primarily on persons with MS and CFS. The vast majority of these studies have examined self-reported fatigue, an approach that benefits from ease of administration but suffers from significant difficulties in interpretation. For example, we know that self-reported fatigue most often correlates with the degree of psychopathology.1 We also know that with more than 100 years of inquiry, self-reported fatigue does not correlate with objective measures of fatigue. As such, when functional imaging studies show a relationship between self-reported fatigue and activities in distinct areas of the brain, one must remain cautious about the interpretation of these results. A more recent approach in the functional imaging literature is to assess fatigue behaviorally during scanning and relate such objective measures of fatigue with cerebral activation. Although this is a new and novel approach, it remains unclear if this approach of operationally defining fatigue behaviorally will be a more valid paradigm in understanding the elusive construct of fatigue. Although fatigue is extraordinarily common as a symptom in many neurologic and psychiatric diseases, little is known about its precise mechanism. Chaudhuri and Behan hypothesized that the nonmotor functions of the basal ganglia play a key role in central fatigue. Specifically, they posit that fatigue is due to "alterations in the normal flow of sequential activation within the basal ganglia system affecting the neural integrator and the cortical feedback by the associated loop of the striato-thalamo-cortical fibers is a possible mechanism of central fatigue ." (p40). Therefore, other regions interacting with the basal ganglia may also contribute to fatigue, including the frontal cortex, thalamus, and the amygdala. In general, the functional imaging studies reviewed in this article tend to generally support the suggestion that damage to cortical-subcortical circuitry might be to blame for fatigue as well. If indeed fatigue is associated with functional impairment in a cortical-subcortical circuitry, it might be that studies that have examined structural damage (eg, total lesion load throughout the brain) may simply not provide the sensitivity required to detect a relationship between fatigue and pathology. After more than 100 years of frustration, it appears that functional neuroimaging techniques promise to provide an exciting potential for significant advances in our elusive understanding of the brain mechanisms associated with fatigue in clinical populations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pmr.2008.12.007

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The basal ganglia and frontal lobes have been implicated in diseases such as chronic fatigue syndrome.

    “In addition, conceptual models have suggested a role for the anterior insula and the dorsal ACC in fatigue, particularly in the context of inflammation (Dantzer et al., 2014; Karshikoff et al., 2017), while the basal ganglia and frontal lobes have been implicated in diseases such chronic fatigue syndrome (DeLuca et al., 2009).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
DeLuca, J., Genova, H. M., Capili, E. J., & Wylie, G. R.
Affiliations
  • Kessler Foundation (US)
  • Rutgers New Jersey Medical School (US)
Corresponding author
DeLuca, John
Venue
Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics of North America
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-05
Volume
20
Issue
2
Pages
325-337
ISSN
1047-9651 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2078504565
Cited by
91
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 4
FWCI
0.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics of North America (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
Keywords
fatigue, central fatigue, functional neuroimaging, multiple sclerosis, chronic fatigue syndrome, subjective fatigue, basal ganglia, frontal cortex, thalamus, amygdala
MeSH terms
Basal Ganglia, Diagnosis, Differential, Fatigue, Frontal Lobe, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review