Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 85

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Neural progenitor NT2N cell lines from teratocarcinoma for transplantation therapy in stroke

HARA, K, YASUHARA, T, MAKI, M, MATSUKAWA, N, MASUDA, T, YU, S, ALI, M, YU, G, XU, L, KIM, S·2008·Progress in Neurobiology

Abstract

This review article discusses recent progress on the use of teratocarcinoma-derived Ntera2/D1 neuron-like cells (NT2N cells, also called hNT cells) as graft source for cell transplantation in stroke. Laboratory evidence has demonstrated the therapeutic potential of NT2N cells in stroke therapy. Phase I and II clinical trials have shown the cells' feasibility, safety and tolerability profiles in stroke patients. Despite these novel features of NT2N cells, the transplantation regimen remains to be optimized. Moreover, determining the mechanisms underlying the grafts' beneficial effects, specifically demonstrating functional synaptic connections between host brain and NT2N cell grafts, warrants further examination. The major limiting factor for initiating a large clinical trial is the cells' highly potent proliferative property due to their cancerous origin, thereby raising the concern that these cells may revert to a neoplastic state over time after transplantation. To this end, we explored a proof-of-concept "retroviral" strategy to further establish the post-mitotic status of NT2N cells by transfecting these cells with the transcription factor Nurr1, in addition to the standard treatment with retinoic acid and mitotic inhibitors. This new cell line NT2N.Nurr1 displays an expedited neuronal commitment and secretes a high level of the neurotrophic factor glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF), and when transplanted into the rodent stroke brain expressed neuronal phe…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2008.04.005

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 85

Metadata

Authors
HARA, K., YASUHARA, T., MAKI, M., MATSUKAWA, N., MASUDA, T., YU, S., ALI, M., YU, G., XU, L., & KIM, S.
Venue
Progress in Neurobiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-07
Volume
85
Issue
3
Pages
318-334
ISSN
0301-0082
Cited by
85
References
4
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review