Cited by 2,132Neonatal and fetal brain pathologyNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanismsTraumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 252 of the 252 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Brain development in rodents and humans: Identifying benchmarks of maturation and vulnerability to injury across species

Open access
Semple, Bridgette D., Blomgren, Klas, Gimlin, Kayleen, Ferriero, Donna M., Noble-Haeusslein, Linda J.·2013·Progress in Neurobiology

Abstract

Hypoxic-ischemic and traumatic brain injuries are leading causes of long-term mortality and disability in infants and children. Although several preclinical models using rodents of different ages have been developed, species differences in the timing of key brain maturation events can render comparisons of vulnerability and regenerative capacities difficult to interpret. Traditional models of developmental brain injury have utilized rodents at postnatal day 7-10 as being roughly equivalent to a term human infant, based historically on the measurement of post-mortem brain weights during the 1970s. Here we will examine fundamental brain development processes that occur in both rodents and humans, to delineate a comparable time course of postnatal brain development across species. We consider the timing of neurogenesis, synaptogenesis, gliogenesis, oligodendrocyte maturation and age-dependent behaviors that coincide with developmentally regulated molecular and biochemical changes. In general, while the time scale is considerably different, the sequence of key events in brain maturation is largely consistent between humans and rodents. Further, there are distinct parallels in regional vulnerability as well as functional consequences in response to brain injuries. With a focus on developmental hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy and traumatic brain injury, this review offers guidelines for researchers when considering the most appropriate rodent age for the developmental stage or process of interest to approximate human brain development.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2013.04.001

Cites

252 of 252 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

1 retracted

Items 201–252 of 252

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Huang, 2009, Long-term cognitive impairment and myelination deficiency in a rat model of perinatal hypoxic-ischemic brain injury, Brain Research, 1301, 100, 10.1016/j.brainres.2009.09.006 · DOI
  2. Prins, 2008, Cerebral metabolic adaption and keton metabolism after brain injury, JCBFM, 28, 1
  3. Volpe, 2000, Overview: normal and abnormal human brain development, Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 6, 1, 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2779(2000)6:1<1::AID-MRDD1>3.0.CO;2-J · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 2,132

Metadata

Authors
Semple, B. D., Blomgren, K., Gimlin, K., Ferriero, D. M., & Noble-Haeusslein, L. J.
Affiliations
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
Corresponding author
Semple, Bridgette D.
Venue
Progress in Neurobiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-07
Volume
106-107
Pages
1-16
ISSN
0301-0082 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2027917639
Cited by
2,132
References
252
Citations by year
2026: 156 · 2025: 210 · 2024: 211 · 2023: 212 · 2022: 219 · 2021: 241 · 2020: 213 · 2019: 203 · 2018: 164 · 2017: 128 · 2016: 80 · 2015: 51 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 9
FWCI
8.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Progress in Neurobiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01ns077767-02)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (#R01NS077767, R01NS050159, NS077767)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Neonatal and fetal brain pathology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
Keywords
brain development, developmental brain injury, hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy, traumatic brain injury, rodent models, postnatal development, neurogenesis, synaptogenesis, gliogenesis, oligodendrocyte maturation, species differences, developmental vulnerability, preclinical models
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain, Brain Injuries, Humans, Oligodendroglia, Rodentia, Hypoxia-Ischemia, Brain, Neurogenesis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review