The DOI matches its Crossref record; 322 of the 322 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The septo-hippocampal system, learning and recovery of function
Abstract
We understand this review as an attempt to summarize recent advances in the understanding of cholinergic function in cognition. Such a role has been highlighted in the 1970s by the discovery that dementia patients have greatly reduced cholinergic activity in cortex and hippocampus. A brief anatomical description of the major cholinergic pathways focuses on the basal forebrain and its projections to cortex and hippocampus. From this distinction, compelling evidence suggests that the basal forebrain --> cortex projection regulates the excitability of principal cortical neurons and is thereby critically involved in attention, stimulus detection and memory function, although the biological conditions for these functions are still debated. Similar uncertainties remain for the septo-hippocampal cholinergic system. Although initial lesions of the septum caused memory deficits reminiscent of hippocampal ablations, recent and more refined neurotoxic lesion studies which spared non-cholinergic cells of the basal forebrain failed to confirm these memory impairments in experimental animals despite a near total loss of cholinergic labeling. Yet, a decline in cholinergic markers in aging and dementia still stands as the most central piece of evidence for a link between the cholinergic system and cognition and appear to provide valuable targets for therapeutic approaches.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The dorsal hippocampus-septal network contributes to cognitive functions,119,120”
From Preferential loss of dorsal-hippocampus synapses underlies memory impairments provoked by short, multimodal stress (2014) · cites this paper as [120]
Citations
Cites
Place navigation impaired in rats with hippocampal lesions
Morris, R. G. M., Garrud, P., Rawlins, J. N. P., & O'Keefe, J. (1982) · Nature · doi:10.1038/297681a0 · Cited by 6,340
The cholinergic hypothesis of geriatric memory dysfunction
Bartus, R. T., Dean, R. L., Beer, B., & Lippa, A. S. (1982) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7046051 · Cited by 5,545
Alzheimer's Disease and Senile Dementia: Loss of Neurons in the Basal Forebrain
Whitehouse, P., Price, D., Struble, R., Clark, A., Coyle, J., & DeLong, M. R. (1982) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7058341 · Cited by 3,627
Large-scale neurocognitive networks and distributed processing for attention, language, and memory
Mesulam, M. (1990) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.410280502 · Cited by 2,684
Modality-Specific Retrograde Amnesia of Fear
Kim, J. J., & Fanselow, M. S. (1992) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1585183 · Cited by 2,483
Central cholinergic pathways in the rat: An overview based on an alternative nomenclature (Ch1–Ch6)
Mesulam, M. M., Mufson, E. J., Wainer, B. H., & Levey, A. I. (1983) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/0306-4522(83)90108-2 · Cited by 2,329
Perry, E., Tomlinson, B. E., Blessed, G., Bergmann, K., Gibson, P., & Perry, R. H. (1978) · British medical journal · doi:10.1136/bmj.2.6150.1457 · Cited by 2,043
Mesulam, M. ‐., Mufson, E. J., Levey, A. I., & Wainer, B. H. (1983) · Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.902140206 · Cited by 1,962
Context, time, and memory retrieval in the interference paradigms of Pavlovian learning
Bouton, M. E. (1993) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.114.1.80 · Cited by 1,896
Human Memory and the Cholinergic System
Drachman, D. A. (1974) · Archives of Neurology · doi:10.1001/archneur.1974.00490320001001 · Cited by 1,398
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Etherington, 1987, Comparative effects of nucleus basalis and fimbria–fornix lesions on delayed matching and alteration tests memory, Neurosci Res Commun, 22, 441
- Schliebs, 1998, Basal forebrain cholinergic dysfunction-experimental approaches and the diseased brain, Int J Dev Neurosci, 16, 591
- Voytko, 1994, Basal forebrain lesions in monkeys disrupt attention but not learning and memory, J Neurosci, 14, 167-16
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Maras, P. M., Molet, J., Chen, Y., Rice, C., Ji, S. G., Solodkin, A., & Baram, T. Z. (2014) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/mp.2014.12 · Cited by 118
Metadata
- Authors
- Niewiadomska, G., Baksalerska-Pazera, M., & Riedel, G.
- Affiliations
- Instytut Biologii Doświadczalnej im. Marcelego Nenckiego (PL)
- University of Aberdeen (GB)
- ORCID
- Riedel, Gernot
- Venue
- Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-08
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 791-805
- ISSN
- 0278-5846 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1979648372
- Cited by
- 67
- References
- 322
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 3.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases
- Keywords
- memory impairment, septal lesions, hippocampal ablation, cortical excitability, attention, stimulus detection, dementia, aging, cholinergic markers, functional recovery, learning
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Cognition Disorders, Hippocampus, Humans, Learning, Nerve Net, Recovery of Function, Septum of Brain
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review