Cited by 49Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation StudiesSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Gender does not matter: add-on repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment for female methamphetamine dependents

Liu, Ting, Li, Yongqiang, Shen, Ying, Liu, Xiaoli, Yuan, Ti-Fei·2019·Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry

Abstract

Background Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) targeting prefrontal cortex reduces craving in different types of drug addiction. However, most studies failed to elucidate the potential gender discrepancies for the treatment effects, due to the small percentage of female subjects enrolled. The present study prospectively recruited female methamphetamine dependents for TMS treatment.Methods Ninety female methamphetamine dependents were randomly assigned into the control group (routine addiction rehabilitation) or add-on 10 Hz group (routine addiction rehabilitation plus 20 times rTMS treatments). The craving scores to drug associated cues were examined as the primary outcome for this treatment.Results The results showed that add-on rTMS treatment was as well effective in female methamphetamine dependents, and the effect lasted for at least 30 days after treatment. Drug abuse history predicts the efficacy of chronic treatment, and the effects of TMS treatment was more pronounced in young, high-craving subjects.Conclusions Add-on high frequency rTMS treatment is as well tolerable and effective in female methamphetamine dependents.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2018.12.018

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liu, T., Li, Y., Shen, Y., Liu, X., & Yuan, T.-F.
Affiliations
  • Nanjing Normal University (CN)
  • Jiangsu Province Hospital (CN)
  • Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
Corresponding author
Yuan, Ti-Fei
Venue
Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-06
Volume
92
Pages
70-75
ISSN
0278-5846 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2906880337
Cited by
49
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 4
FWCI
2.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • NSFC Grant (81822017, 31771215, 81702230)
  • The Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (18QA1403700, 18JC1420304, 18140901700)
  • Shanghai Municipal Education Commission – Gaofeng Clinical Medicine (20181715)
  • Hundred-talent Fund from Shanghai Municipal Commission of Health (2018BR21)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, methamphetamine dependence, women who use drugs, gender differences, craving, drug cues, prefrontal cortex, adjunctive therapy, addiction rehabilitation, treatment efficacy
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Central Nervous System Stimulants, Feasibility Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Methamphetamine, Middle Aged, Sex Factors, Time Factors, Treatment Outcome, Prefrontal Cortex, Amphetamine-Related Disorders, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, Young Adult, Craving

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review