Cited by 45Genetic Associations and EpidemiologyNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorStroke Rehabilitation and Recovery

Shared genetic risk factors for depression and stroke

Zhao, Fuying, Yue, Yingying, Jiang, Haitang, Yuan, Yonggui·2019·Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry

Abstract

Background The comorbidity of major depressive disorder (MDD) and stroke are common in clinic. There is a growing body of evidence suggesting a bi-directional relationship between stroke and depression. However, the mechanisms underlying the relationship between MDD and stroke are poorly investigated. Considering that both MDD and stroke can be heritable and are influenced by multiple risk genes, shared genetic risk factors between MDD and stroke may exist. Objective The objective is to review the existing evidence for common genetic risk factors for both MDD and stroke and to outline the possible pathophysiological mechanisms mediating this association. Methods A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed. Gene association studies regarding stroke and depression were searched in the database PubMed, CNKI, and Chinese Biomedical Literature Database before December 2018. Statistical analysis was performed using the software Revman 5.3. Results Genetic polymorphisms of 4 genes, methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) and apolipoprotein E (ApoE) have been demonstrated to associate with the increased risk for both MDD and stroke, while the association between identified polymorphisms in angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) and serum paraoxonase (PON1) with depression is still under debate, for the existing studies are insufficient in sample size. These results suggest the possible pathophysiological mechanisms that are common to these two disorders, including immune-inf…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2019.03.003

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhao, F., Yue, Y., Jiang, H., & Yuan, Y.
Affiliations
Zhongda Hospital Southeast University (CN)
Corresponding author
Yuan, Yonggui
Venue
Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-07
Volume
93
Pages
55-70
ISSN
0278-5846 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2925222320
Cited by
45
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1
FWCI
0.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Key Technology R&D Program (2015BAI13B01)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
Keywords
major depressive disorder, stroke, shared genetic risk, MTHFR polymorphisms, apolipoprotein E, angiotensin-converting enzyme, paraoxonase 1, post-stroke depression, oxidative stress, nitrative stress, lipid metabolism, cerebrovascular function
MeSH terms
Apolipoproteins E, Depression, Humans, Peptidyl-Dipeptidase A, Risk Factors, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Stroke, Methylenetetrahydrofolate Reductase (NADPH2), Aryldialkylphosphatase

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review