Cited by 79Atmospheric chemistry and aerosolsMarine and coastal ecosystemsHeavy metals in environment

Atmospheric deposition of soluble trace elements along the Atlantic Meridional Transect (AMT)

Open access
Baker, Alex R., Jickells, Tim D.·2017·Progress in Oceanography

Abstract

We briefly review the role of atmospheric deposition measurements within the Atlantic Meridional Transect (AMT) programme and then go on to present new data on the soluble concentrations of a range of trace metals (Fe, Al, Mn, Ti, Zn, V, Ni and Cu) and major ions in aerosols collected along the AMT transect. The results allow us to identify emission sources of the trace metals particularly in terms of the relative importance of anthropogenic versus crustal sources. We identify strong gradients in concentrations and deposition for both crustal and anthropogenically sourced metals with much higher inputs to the North Atlantic compared to the South Atlantic, reflecting stronger land based emission sources in the Northern Hemisphere. We suggest anthropogenic sources of Ni and V may include an important component from shipping. We consider the extent to which these gradients are reflected in surface water concentrations of these metals based on the GEOTRACES water column trace metal data. We find there is a clear difference in the concentrations of surface water dissolved Al and Fe between the north and south Atlantic gyres reflecting atmospheric inputs. However for Mn, V or Ni, higher inputs to the North Atlantic compared to the South Atlantic are not clearly reflected in their water column concentrations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pocean.2016.10.002

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • North Atlantic waters underlying the SAL dust plume are richer in Fe, Si, Al, Ti, Mn, P and other trace metals bio-essential for phytoplankton, in comparison with South Atlantic waters.

    “Due to massive dust deposition, North Atlantic waters underlying the SAL dust plume are richer in Fe, Si, Al, Ti, Mn, P and other trace metals bio-essential for phytoplankton, in comparison with South Atlantic waters (Han et al., 2008;Ussher et al., 2013;Conway and John, 2014;Baker and Jickells, 2017).”

    From African desert dust influences migrations and fisheries of the Atlantic skipjack-tuna (2023) · cites this paper as Baker and Jickells, 2017

    The Introduction and §3.2 report higher dissolved Fe and Al in North Atlantic surface waters, consistent with greater Saharan dust input. But §3.2 finds little north–south difference in surface-water Mn despite higher deposition, and the Introduction says atmospheric Si has little effect on water-column biogeochemistry. The paper therefore does not support the claim that the waters are richer in the entire listed set of elements; page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Baker, A.R. et al., 2006a. Trends in aerosol nutrient solubility along a west -east transect of the Saharan dust plume. Geophys. Res. Lett. 33, L07805. http://dx. doi.org/10.1029/2005GL024764. · DOI
  2. Baker, A.R. et al., 2014. Processing and aging in the atmosphere. In: Knippertz, P., Stuut, J.-B.W. (Eds.), Mineral Dust. Springer, Heidelberg.
  3. Bruland, K.W., Lohan, M.C., 2003. 6.02 -Controls of trace metals in seawater A2 - Holland, Heinrich D. In: Turekian, K.K. (Ed.), Treatise on Geochemistry. Pergamon, Oxford.
  4. Han, Q. et al., 2008. Constraining oceanic dust deposition using surface ocean dissolved Al. Global Biogeochem. Cycl. 22, GB2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/ 2007GB002975. · DOI · Paper page
  5. Jickells, T. et al., 2014. Biogeochemical impacts of dust on the global carbon cycle. In: Knippertz, P., Struut, J.-B.W. (Eds.), Mineral Dust. Springer, Heidelberg.
  6. Jickells, T.D., Baker, A.R., Chance, R., 2016. Atmospheric transport of trace elements and nutrients to the oceans. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 374, 20150286. http://dx.doi. org/10.1098/rsta.2015.0286. · DOI
  7. Johnson, M.T. et al., 2008. Field observations of the ocean-atmosphere exchange of ammonia: fundamental importance of temperature as revealed by a comparison of high and low latitudes. Global Biogeochem. Cycl. 22. Krishnamurthy, A. et al., 2010. Impacts of atmospheric nutrient inputs on marine biogeochemistry. J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeosci. 115, G01006. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1029/2009jg001115. · DOI
  8. Longhurst, A.R., 2007. Ecological Geography of the Sea. Academic Press, Burlington, MA.
  9. Norman, M., Leck, C., 2005. Distribution of marine boundary layer ammonia over the Atlantic and Indian Oceans during the Aerosols99 cruise. J. Geophys. Res. 110, D16302. http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2005JD005866. · DOI
  10. Okin, G. et al., 2011. Impacts of atmospheric nutrient deposition on marine productivity: roles of nitrogen, phosphorus, and iron. Global Biogeochem. Cycl. 25, GB2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2010GB003858. · DOI
  11. Paytan, A. et al., 2009. Toxicity of atmospheric aerosols on marine phytoplankton. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106, 4601-4605.
  12. Seinfeld, J.H., Pandis, S.N., 1998. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics: From Air Pollution to Climate Change. Wiley-Interscience, New York.
  13. Wu, J. et al., 2007. Dissolution of aerosol iron in the surface waters of the North Pacific and North Atlantic oceans as determined by a semicontinuous flow- through reactor method. Global Biogeochem. Cycl. 21, GB4010. http://dx.doi. org/10.1029/2006GB002851. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Baker, A. R., & Jickells, T. D.
Affiliations
University of East Anglia (GB)
Corresponding author
Jickells, Tim D.
Venue
Progress in Oceanography
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-11
Volume
158
Pages
41-51
ISSN
0079-6611 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2537249563
Cited by
79
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
2.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Progress In Oceanography (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (submittedVersion)
Funders
UK Natural Environment Research Council (NE/F017359/1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Marine and coastal ecosystems
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Heavy metals in environment
Keywords
atmospheric deposition, Atlantic Meridional Transect, anthropogenic sources, crustal source, North Atlantic, South Atlantic, ship emissions, nickel, vanadium, dissolved aluminum, dissolved iron, GEOTRACES, major ions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review