Cited by 112Marine and coastal ecosystemsAtmospheric aerosols and cloudsAtmospheric chemistry and aerosols

Constraining oceanic dust deposition using surface ocean dissolved Al

Open access
Han, Qin, Moore, J. Keith, Zender, Charles, Measures, Chris, Hydes, David·2008·Global Biogeochemical Cycles

Abstract

We use measurements of ocean surface dissolved Al, a global Biogeochemical Elemental Cycling (BEC) ocean model, and the global Dust Entrainment and Deposition (DEAD) model to constrain dust deposition to the oceans. Our Al database contains all available measurements with best coverage in the Atlantic. Vertical profiles and seasonal data exist in limited regions. Observations show that surface dissolved Al is distributed similarly to the dust deposition predicted by DEAD and other models. There is an equatorial Atlantic Al maximum that decreases toward higher latitudes. There are high Al concentrations in the Mediterranean Sea and the Arabian Sea and low concentrations in the Pacific and the Southern Ocean. The ocean basins maintain more distinct Al profiles than Fe profiles in the upper ocean, consistent with a weaker biological influence on Al than Fe. The BEC‐predicted surface dissolved Al compares relatively well with observations. The Al distribution reflects the combined effects of Al input from dust and Al removal by particle scavenging and biological uptake by diatoms. Model‐observed biases suggest a southward shift of maximum dust deposition compared to current dust model predictions. DEAD appears to overestimate deposition north of 30°N in the Pacific and to underestimate deposition south of 30°N. Observed Al concentrations and the ocean model–predicted surface Al lifetime provide a semi‐independent method to estimate oceanic dust deposition. This technique indicate…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/2007gb002975

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • North Atlantic waters underlying the SAL dust plume are richer in Fe, Si, Al, Ti, Mn, P and other trace metals bio-essential for phytoplankton, in comparison with South Atlantic waters.

    “Due to massive dust deposition, North Atlantic waters underlying the SAL dust plume are richer in Fe, Si, Al, Ti, Mn, P and other trace metals bio-essential for phytoplankton, in comparison with South Atlantic waters (Han et al., 2008;Ussher et al., 2013;Conway and John, 2014;Baker and Jickells, 2017).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Han, Q., Moore, J. K., Zender, C., Measures, C., & Hydes, D.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Irvine (US)
  • Department of Earth System Science University of California, Irvine Irvine California USA
Venue
Global Biogeochemical Cycles
Published
2008-04-12
Volume
22
Issue
2
ISSN
  • 0886-6236 (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-9224
OpenAlex
W1640236186
Cited by
112
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 10
FWCI
5.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Global Biogeochemical Cycles (publishedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
  • NERC Open Research Archive (Natural Environment Research Council) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Marine and coastal ecosystems
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
Keywords
dissolved aluminum, model evaluation, equatorial Atlantic, particle scavenging, iron, marine geochemistry, Southern Ocean, Arabian Sea

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review