Cited by 44Fish Ecology and Management StudiesMarine and fisheries researchFish Biology and Ecology Studies

Phenological mismatch, carryover effects, and marine survival in a wild steelhead trout Oncorhynchus mykiss population

Open access
Wilson, Samantha M., Buehrens, Thomas W., Fisher, Jennifer L., Wilson, Kyle L., Moore, Jonathan W.·2021·Progress in Oceanography

Abstract

• Annual phenological mismatches decrease survival of steelhead trout smolts. • Larger steelhead smolts at outmigration had higher ocean survival. • Optimal outmigration date varied annually. • Freshwater and marine growing conditions act together to influence ocean survival. • Match/mismatch hypothesis may be a useful tool for predicting salmonid recruitment. Climate-driven changes in the oceans, such as shifts in prey timing and abundance, could influence variability in population productivity of marine fishes. For example, according to the match/mismatch hypothesis, the temporal matching of the young salmon outmigration from freshwater to the ocean relative to the timing of availability of their prey could influence their marine survival. Indeed, understanding patterns and processes of marine survival is particularly pressing in many salmon and steelhead trout populations due to recent declines. To determine whether phenological mismatches between juvenile salmonids and their prey could contribute to low ocean survival, we analyzed the migration timing and ocean survival of 22,116 tagged juvenile steelhead trout Oncorhynchus mykiss over 12 years from the Wind River, Washington State, USA. We used a Bayesian multilevel modelling approach with variable selection to assess how survival was associated with body size, river exit date, the biological spring transition date (the day when northern zooplankton first appeared in the coastal region near the Columbia River estuary), a…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pocean.2021.102533

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wilson, S. M., Buehrens, T. W., Fisher, J. L., Wilson, K. L., & Moore, J. W.
Affiliations
  • Simon Fraser University (CA)
  • Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (US)
  • Oregon State University (US)
Corresponding author
Wilson, Samantha M.
Venue
Progress in Oceanography
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-04
Volume
193
Pages
102533
ISSN
0079-6611 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3132135017
Cited by
44
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3
FWCI
4.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Progress In Oceanography (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish Ecology and Management Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine and fisheries research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Fish Biology and Ecology Studies
Keywords
steelhead, rainbow trout, phenological mismatch, match-mismatch hypothesis, residual effects, marine survival, body size, sea surface temperature

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review