Shot scale matters: The effect of close-up frequency on mental state attribution in film viewers
Open accessAbstract
Mental state attribution, an important aspect of social cognition, refers to the verbalization of mental state references observed in another person. Fictional film narratives can elicit social cognition and mental state attribution specifically, however, little is known about the cinematographic techniques underlying this effect and their link to mental state attribution. The present experiment focuses on the role of close-up shots of the character's face in viewers’ mental state attribution, as well as in their cognitive and affective processing more generally. The online experiment (N = 495) included thirteen versions of an animated film and employed a 6 (different number of close-up shots) × 2 (facial expressions) factorial between-subject design, with an additional zero close-up control condition. Participants were randomly assigned to one version of the film and subsequently asked to describe the story (with and without a prompt for mental state attribution). In these free responses, the study used a quantitative content analytic method (with independent blind-coders) to identify the proportion of spontaneous and prompted mental state attributions (i.e. explicit mental state references to the character), as well as cognitive and affective processing employed by viewers. Additionally, we tested the moderation effect of character facial expression (in the close-up) and participant gender. Confirming our main hypothesis, close-up frequency significantly influenced spontaneous, but not prompted mental state attribution. Results indicate that increasing the number of close-ups may elicit a higher proportion of spontaneous mental state attribution up to a certain point, beyond which it may decrease the proportion of spontaneous mental state attributions. Results suggest that the effect of close-up frequency is specific to mental state attribution rather than some general effect on cognitive and affective processing of narratives.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
The Psychological Meaning of Words: LIWC and Computerized Text Analysis Methods
Tausczik, Y. R., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2010) · Journal of Language and Social Psychology · doi:10.1177/0261927x09351676 · Cited by 5,774 · see citing works
The functional architecture of human empathy
Decety, J., & Jackson, P. L. (2004) · Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience Reviews · doi:10.1177/1534582304267187 · Cited by 3,407 · see citing works
The limited capacity model of mediated message processing
Lang, A. (2000) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2000.tb02833.x · Cited by 2,153 · see citing works
Social Cognitive Neuroscience: A Review of Core Processes
Lieberman, M. D. (2007) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085654 · Cited by 2,010 · see citing works
Attachment and reflective function: Their role in self-organization
FONAGY, P., & TARGET, M. (1997) · Development and Psychopathology · doi:10.1017/s0954579497001399 · Cited by 1,708 · see citing works
Reading literary fiction improves theory of mind
Kidd, D. C., & Castano, E. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1239918 · Cited by 1,642 · see citing works
The Function of Fiction is the Abstraction and Simulation of Social Experience
Mar, R. A., & Oatley, K. (2008) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00073.x · Cited by 1,345 · see citing works
Do humans have two systems to track beliefs and belief-like states
Apperly, I. A., & Butterfill, S. A. (2009) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/a0016923 · Cited by 1,261 · see citing works
Sharp, C., & Fonagy, P. (2008) · Social Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9507.2007.00457.x · Cited by 480 · see citing works
Leisure reading and social cognition: A meta-analysis.
Mumper, M. L., & Gerrig, R. J. (2017) · Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts · doi:10.1037/aca0000089 · Cited by 249 · see citing works
Fiction reading has a small positive impact on social cognition: A meta-analysis.
Dodell-Feder, D., & Tamir, D. I. (2018) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/xge0000395 · Cited by 223 · see citing works
The emergence of a shared action ontology: building blocks for a theory
Metzinger, T., & Gallese, V. (2003) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/s1053-8100(03)00072-2 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
Watching More Closely: Shot Scale Affects Film Viewers’ Theory of Mind Tendency But Not Ability
Rooney, B., & Bálint, K. E. (2018) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02349 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Bálint, K. E., Blessing, J. N., & Rooney, B.
- Affiliations
- University of Augsburg (DE)
- University College Dublin (IE)
- Corresponding author
- Rooney, Brendan
- Venue
- Poetics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-12
- Volume
- 83
- Pages
- 101480
- ISSN
- 0304-422X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3045886136
- Cited by
- 48
- References
- 13
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 22
- FWCI
- 69.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Poetics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- VU Research Portal (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- OPUS (Augsburg University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Harvard University
- Johns Hopkins University
- University of Oxford
- Council for Research in the Social Sciences, Columbia University
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Narrative Theory and Analysis
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Media Influence and Health
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Ethics, Aesthetics, and Art
- Keywords
- mental state attribution, theory of mind, close-up, cinematography, facial expressions, film viewing, social cognition, gender differences
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review