Cited by 20Ethics and Social Impacts of AIDigitalization, Law, and RegulationICT Impact and Policies

On pipelines, readiness and annotative labour: Political geographies of AI and data infrastructures in Africa

Open access
Holden, Kerry, Harsh, Matthew·2024·Political Geography

Abstract

Data infrastructures are expanding rapidly across African societies, renewing the promise of modernisation, and providing a massive data resource to the dominant tech powers of the world. Google's private undersea cable, named Equiano, landed in west Africa with the intention of igniting data services, smart environments, investment opportunities and jobs. Non-governmental and multilateral agencies are busy supporting African governments in building regulatory frameworks that aim to ‘ready’ countries for the 4th industrial revolution. Young Africans labour in remodelled shipping containers to annotate data and train algorithms. While future promises pan out in wide-angled, utopian visions, this paper sets out an approach to understand African contexts as sites of heterogeneous experience of data infrastructures that are historically and politically contingent. The paper explores the spatial politics of extraction, surveillance, and exploitation in three examples of the Equiano pipeline, the Artificial Intelligence (AI) Readiness Index, and the AI annotative labour force. We challenge the homogenising discourses of global tech companies and transnational governance institutions in accounting for the geographical histories of colonialism and its afterlives in African societies. We further call for empirical studies that examine the granular multiplicities of data, providing nuanced understandings of AI in and from Africa.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.polgeo.2024.103150

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 39 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Holden, K., & Harsh, M.
Affiliations
  • Queen Mary University of London (GB)
  • California Polytechnic State University (US)
Corresponding author
Holden, Kerry
Venue
Political Geography
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-08
Volume
113
Pages
103150
ISSN
0962-6298 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4399780815
Cited by
16
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 1
FWCI
6.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Political Geography (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Queen Mary Research Online (Queen Mary University of London) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
  • Library of Congress
  • Google
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Social Sciences › Law › Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Media Technology › ICT Impact and Policies
Keywords
data infrastructure, artificial intelligence, AI Readiness Index, algorithm training, colonialism, surveillance, extraction, transnational governance, Africa, Fourth Industrial Revolution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review