CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 21biodegradable polymer synthesis and propertiesPolymer crystallization and propertiesPolymer composites and self-healing

Extruder synthesis of a new class of polyurethanes: Polyacylurethanes based on poly(ε-caprolactone) oligomers

Open access
Heijkants, R.G.J.C., Schwab, L.W., van Calck, R.V., de Groot, J.H., Pennings, A.J., Schouten, A.J.·2005·Polymer
DOI 10.1016/j.polymer.2005.06.089
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.polymer.2005.06.089

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The molecular weight of LA is higher than CL (114.14 and 144.13 g mol -1 for CL and LA respectively).

    “This was attributed to the fact that the molecular weight of LA was higher than CL (114.14 and 144.13 g mol -1 for CL and LA respectively [52,53]).”

    From <i>In vitro</i> degradation and mechanical properties of PLA-PCL copolymer unit cell scaffolds generated by two-photon polymerization (2016) · cites this paper as [53]

    Section 3.4, Thermal properties (page unavailable), gives 114.14 g/mol as the molecular mass of an ε-caprolactone monomer. The paper does not give 144.13 g/mol for LA or compare LA’s molecular weight with CL’s, so it supports only the CL value. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 30

  1. Tanzi MC, Verderio P, Lampugnani MG, Resnati M, Dejana E, Sturani E. J Mater Sci Mater Med 1994;5:393-6.
  2. Heijkants RGJC, de Groot JH, Pennings AJ, Schouten AJ. Biomaterials 2005;26:4219-28.
  3. Gogolewski S. Colloid Polym Sci 1989;267:757-85.
  4. Marchant RE, Zhao Q, Anderson JM, Hiltner A. Polymer 1987;28: 2032-9.
  5. Szycher M. J Biomater Appl 1988;3:297-402.
  6. Akkapeddi MK, Gervasi J. Polym Prepr 1988;29:567-8.
  7. Kanamaru M, Takata T, Endo T. Macromol Chem Phys 1995;197: 1795-804.
  8. Cheav SL, Foussard-Blanpin O. Ann Pharm Fr 1990;48:23-31.
  9. Schu ¨tzenberger K. Compt Rend 1862;54:154.
  10. Billeter OC. Berichte 1903;36:3213-8.
  11. Ulrich H. Carbonyl, thiocarbonyl and imidioyl isocyanates. Chemistry and technology of isocyanates. New York: Wiley; 1996. p. 197-240.
  12. Steyermark PR. J Org Chem 1962;28:586-9.
  13. Hill AJ, Degnan WM. J Am Chem Soc 1940;62:1595-6.
  14. Speziale AJ, Smith LR. J Org Chem 1965;30:4306-7.
  15. Speziale AJ, Smith LR. J Org Chem 1963;28:1805-11.
  16. Tsuge O, Itoh T, Tashiro M. Tetrahedron 1967;24:2583-90.
  17. Endo T, Kanamaru M, Takata T. Macromolecules 1994;27:3694-7.
  18. Kanamaru M, Takata T, Endo T. Macromolecules 1994;27:7492-3.
  19. Kanamaru M, Takata T, Endo T. Macromolecules 1995;28:7979-82.
  20. Neindlein R, Bottler R. Chem Ber 1966;100:698-700.
  21. Neindlein R, Heukelbach E. Arch Pharm 1965;299:64-7.
  22. Estrina GA, Rozenberg BA. Polym Sci USSR 1989;31:920-6.
  23. Flory PJ. Trans Faraday Soc 1955;51:848-57.
  24. Boussias CM, Peters RH, Still RH. J Appl Polym Chem 1980;25:855.
  25. Niesten MCEJ, Feijen J, Gaymans RJ. Polymer 2000;41:8487-500.
  26. Crescenzi V, Manzini G, Calzolari G, Borri C. Eur Polym J 1972;8: 449-63.
  27. van Bogart JWC, Gibson PE, Cooper SL. J Polym Sci Polym Phys 1983;21:65-95.
  28. Velanker S, Cooper SL. Macromolecules 1998;31:9181-92.
  29. Pe ˆgo AP, Poot AA, Grijpma DW, Feijen J. J Biomat Sci, Polym E 2001;12:35-53.
  30. Miller JA, Lin SB, Hwang KKS, Wu KS, Gibson PE, Cooper SL. Macromolecules 1985;18:32-44.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Heijkants, R. G. J. C., Schwab, L. W., van Calck, R. V., de Groot, J. H., Pennings, A. J., & Schouten, A. J.
Affiliations
University of Groningen (NL)
Corresponding author
Schouten, A.J.
Venue
Polymer
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-10
Volume
46
Issue
21
Pages
8981-8989
ISSN
0032-3861 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.polymer.2005.06.089
OpenAlex
W2108093105
Cited by
21
References
35
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2016: 5 · 2012: 6
FWCI
0.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Polymer (publishedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Polymer crystallization and properties
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Polymer composites and self-healing
Keywords
reactive extrusion, catalyst-free synthesis, thermal polymerization, microphase separation, microcrystallization, elastomer properties, biodegradable polymers, biomedical polymers, molecular weight effects

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review