The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Postharvest ethanol and potassium sorbate treatments of table grapes to control gray mold
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“On table grapes, reduction of the most economically important postharvest disease, gray mold caused by B. cinerea , has been accomplished with preharvest and/or postharvest treatments with salts such as SBC, SC, PS, PBC, potassium carbonate (PC), or calcium chloride (CaCl2) (Karabulut et al., 2005; Nigro et al., 2006; Youssef and Roberto, 2014).”
From GRAS, plant- and animal-derived compounds as alternatives to conventional fungicides for the control of postharvest diseases of fresh horticultural produce (2016) · cites this paper as Karabulut et al., 2005
Citations
Cites
Karabulut, O. A., Smilanick, J. L., Gabler, F. M., Mansour, M., & Droby, S. (2003) · Plant Disease · doi:10.1094/pdis.2003.87.11.1384 · Cited by 139
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 14
- Feliciano, 1992, Efficacy of ethanol in postharvest benomyl-DCNA treatments for control of brown rot of peach, Plant Dis., 76, 226, 10.1094/PD-76-0226 · DOI
- Gabler, 2001, Postharvest control of table grape gray mold on detached berries with carbonate and bicarbonate salts and disinfectants, Am. J. Enol. Vitic., 52, 12, 10.5344/ajev.2001.52.1.12 · DOI · Paper page
- Gabler, 2005, Impact of postharvest hot water and ethanol treatment of table grapes on gray mold incidence, quality, ethanol content, Plant Dis., 89, 309, 10.1094/PD-89-0309 · DOI
- Karabulut, 2001, Evaluation of the use of sodium bicarbonate, potassium sorbate and yeast antagonists for decreasing postharvest decay of sweet cherries, Postharvest Biol. Technol., 23, 233, 10.1016/S0925-5214(01)00151-X · DOI
- Karabulut, 2004, Postharvest ethanol and hot water treatments of table grapes to control gray mold, Postharvest Biol. Technol., 34, 169, 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2004.05.003 · DOI
- Lichter, 2002, Ethanol controls postharvest decay of table grapes, Postharvest Biol. Technol., 24, 301, 10.1016/S0925-5214(01)00141-7 · DOI
- Lopez-Malo, 2002, Aspergillus flavus dose-response curves to selected natural synthetic antimicrobials, Int. J. Food Microbiol., 73, 213, 10.1016/S0168-1605(01)00639-0 · DOI
- Margosan, 1997, Combination of hot water and ethanol to control postharvest decay of peaches and nectarines, Plant Dis., 81, 1405, 10.1094/PDIS.1997.81.12.1405 · DOI
- Mari, 2004, Postharvest control of Monilinia laxa and Rhizopus stolonifer in stone fruit by peracetic acid, Postharvest Biol. Technol., 33, 319, 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2004.02.011 · DOI
- Palou, 2002, Evaluation of food additives and alternative chemicals for the control of Penicilium digitatum Sacc. and Penicilium italicum Wehmer on citrus fruit, Pest. Manage. Sci., 58, 459, 10.1002/ps.477 · DOI
- Richer, 1987, Synergism—a patent view, Pest. Sci., 19, 309, 10.1002/ps.2780190408 · DOI
- Smilanick, 1995, Evaluation of heated solutions of sulfur dioxide, ethanol, and hydrogen peroxide to control postharvest green mold of lemons, Plant Dis., 79, 742, 10.1094/PD-79-0742 · DOI
- Wild, 1987, Fungicidal activity of potassium sorbate against Penicillium digitatum as affected by thiabendazole and dip temperature, Sci. Hort., 32, 41, 10.1016/0304-4238(87)90015-X · DOI · Paper page
- Zahavi, 2000, Biological control of Botrytis, Aspergillus and Rhizopus rots on table and wine grapes in Israel, Postharvest Biol. Technol., 20, 115, 10.1016/S0925-5214(00)00118-6 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Palou, L., Ali, A., Fallik, E., & Romanazzi, G. (2016) · Postharvest Biology and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.postharvbio.2016.04.017 · Cited by 286
Self-citationEthanol on the postharvest control of anthracnose in ‘Kumagai’ guava
Ponzo, F. S., Benato, E. A., Silva, B. M. P. D., & Cia, P. (2017) · Bragantia · doi:10.1590/1678-4499.2016482 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Karabulut, O. A., Romanazzi, G., Smilanick, J. L., & Lichter, A.
- Affiliations
- Marche Polytechnic University (IT)
- Agricultural Research Service (US)
- Agricultural Research Organization (IL)
- Venue
- Postharvest Biology and Technology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2005-08
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 129-134
- ISSN
- 0925-5214 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2083275331
- Cited by
- 64
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 7
- FWCI
- 3.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Postharvest Biology and Technology (publishedVersion)
- Bursa Uludag University - AVESIS (submittedVersion)
- Università Politecnica delle Marche (Università Politecnica delle Marche) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Fungal Plant Pathogen Control
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Powdery Mildew Fungal Diseases
- Keywords
- gray mold, Botrytis cinerea, table grapes, ethanol treatment, potassium sorbate, spore germination inhibition, postharvest disease control, cold storage, Thompson Seedless, Flame Seedless
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review