The DOI matches its Crossref record; 94 of the 94 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Alternative management technologies for postharvest disease control: The journey from simplicity to complexity
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Basic aspects of food preservation by hurdle technology
Leistner, L. (2000) · International Journal of Food Microbiology · doi:10.1016/s0168-1605(00)00161-6 · Cited by 1,155
Sharma, R. R., Singh, D., & Singh, R. (2009) · Biological Control · doi:10.1016/j.biocontrol.2009.05.001 · Cited by 1,015
B IOLOGICAL C ONTROL OF P OSTHARVEST D ISEASES OF F RUITS
Janisiewicz, W. J., & Korsten, L. (2002) · Annual Review of Phytopathology · doi:10.1146/annurev.phyto.40.120401.130158 · Cited by 1,013
Fungal community analysis by high‐throughput sequencing of amplified markers – a user's guide
Lindahl, B. D., Nilsson, R. H., Tedersoo, L., Abarenkov, K., Carlsen, T., Kjøller, R., Kõljalg, U., Pennanen, T., Rosendahl, S., Stenlid, J., et al. (2013) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.12243 · Cited by 892
Pesticides in the Diets of Infants and Children
(1993) · National Academies Press eBooks · doi:10.17226/2126 · Cited by 859
Twenty years of postharvest biocontrol research: Is it time for a new paradigm?
Droby, S., Wisniewski, M., Macarisin, D., & Wilson, C. (2009) · Postharvest Biology and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.postharvbio.2008.11.009 · Cited by 758
Self-citationSpadaro, D., & Droby, S. (2016) · Trends in Food Science & Technology · doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2015.11.003 · Cited by 732
Self-citationEffects of chitosan on control of postharvest diseases and physiological responses of tomato fruit
Liu, J., Tian, S., Meng, X., & Xu, Y. (2007) · Postharvest Biology and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.postharvbio.2006.12.019 · Cited by 527
Self-citationReview: Utilization of antagonistic yeasts to manage postharvest fungal diseases of fruit
Liu, J., Sui, Y., Wisniewski, M., Droby, S., & Liu, Y. (2013) · International Journal of Food Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2013.09.004 · Cited by 521
Self-citationInduced resistance to control postharvest decay of fruit and vegetables
Romanazzi, G., Sanzani, S. M., Bi, Y., Tian, S., Gutiérrez Martínez, P., & Alkan, N. (2016) · Postharvest Biology and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.postharvbio.2016.08.003 · Cited by 451
Cited by
Biological Control of Plant Pathogens: A Global Perspective
Lahlali, R., Ezrari, S., Radouane, N., Kenfaoui, J., Esmaeel, Q., El Hamss, H., Belabess, Z., & Barka, E. A. (2022) · Microorganisms · doi:10.3390/microorganisms10030596 · Cited by 827
Exploitation of microbial antagonists for the control of postharvest diseases of fruits: a review
Dukare, A. S., Paul, S., Nambi, V. E., Gupta, R. K., Singh, R., Sharma, K., & Vishwakarma, R. K. (2019) · Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition · doi:10.1080/10408398.2017.1417235 · Cited by 510
Arrarte, E., Garmendia, G., Rossini, C., Wisniewski, M., & Vero, S. (2017) · Biological Control · doi:10.1016/j.biocontrol.2017.03.002 · Cited by 121
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Wisniewski, M., Droby, S., Norelli, J., Liu, J., & Schena, L.
- Venue
- Postharvest Biology and Technology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-12
- Volume
- 122
- Pages
- 3-10
- ISSN
- 0925-5214 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2430763142
- Cited by
- 305
- References
- 94
- FWCI
- 22.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Alternative management technologies for postharvest disease control: The journey from simplicity to complexity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2016.05.012
- The paper
- Wisniewski, M., Droby, S., Norelli, J., Liu, J., & Schena, L. (2016). Alternative management technologies for postharvest disease control: The journey from simplicity to complexity. Postharvest Biology and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2016.05.012
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
