The DOI matches its Crossref record; 165 of the 165 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Induced resistance to control postharvest decay of fruit and vegetables
Open accessAbstract
More than one third of harvested fruit and vegetables are lost and do not reach the customers mainly due to postharvest decay. During the last decade, several postharvest fungicides have been excluded from the market, or their allowed residues have been significantly decreased. Therefore, there is growing interest in eco-friendly and safe alternatives to synthetic fungicides. Induced resistance has gained increasing attention as a sustainable strategy to manage postharvest decay of fruit and vegetables. Their natural resistance can be increased by various means, such as biocontrol agents or their secreted elicitors. Alternatively, physical means, such as UV-C, ozone, and heat treatment, can prime plant resistance through abiotic stress. Moreover, various defense-related phytohormones, biological elicitors, non-organic elicitors, and volatile organic compounds have been shown to induce plant resistance. During the last decades, new technologies have enabled the evaluation of gene expression, such as quantitative real time PCR and the most recent next-generation sequencing, and thus the quantification of physiological changes, which have revealed new knowledge about preharvest and postharvest induced resistance in response to various treatments. These techniques allow optimization of postharvest application of the control means, although these data cannot disregard the evaluation of in vivo effectiveness. The elicitation of host defenses prevents the appearance of resistant isolates of pathogens. Induced resistance can lead to increased levels of phenolic compounds in the plant tissues, which often have antioxidant properties that are highly beneficial to humans. Moreover, induced resistance preserves the natural microflora, which is rich in potential biocontrol agents, and which provides a combined approach in the control of postharvest decay that is sustainable and safe for both growers and consumers. This approach meets the requirements of integrated disease management on sustainable use of pesticides that in the EU is implemented through Directive 128/2009. This review summarizes recent achievements and knowledge of the elicitation of host defenses to control postharvest decay of fruit and vegetables, and provides an outlook on the new challenges in this fascinating subject.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Oxidative stress, antioxidants and stress tolerance
Mittler, R. (2002) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/s1360-1385(02)02312-9 · Cited by 10,764
Sharma, P., Jha, A. B., Dubey, R. S., & Pessarakli, M. (2012) · Journal of Botany · doi:10.1155/2012/217037 · Cited by 5,473
Contrasting Mechanisms of Defense Against Biotrophic and Necrotrophic Pathogens
Glazebrook, J. (2005) · Annual Review of Phytopathology · doi:10.1146/annurev.phyto.43.040204.135923 · Cited by 4,367
(2011) · FAO eBooks · Cited by 3,368
Induced systemic resistance by beneficial microbes
Pieterse, C. M. J., Zamioudis, C., Berendsen, R. L., Weller, D. M., Van Wees, S. C. M., & Bakker, P. A. H. M. (2014) · Annual Review of Phytopathology · doi:10.1146/annurev-phyto-082712-102340 · Cited by 3,272
Durrant, W. E., & Dong, X. (2004) · Annual Review of Phytopathology · doi:10.1146/annurev.phyto.42.040803.140421 · Cited by 3,184
Hormonal Modulation of Plant Immunity
Pieterse, C. M. J., Van der Does, D., Zamioudis, C., Leon-Reyes, A., & Van Wees, S. C. M. (2012) · Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev-cellbio-092910-154055 · Cited by 2,998
Networking by small-molecule hormones in plant immunity
Pieterse, C. M. J., Leon-Reyes, A., Van der Ent, S., & Van Wees, S. C. M. (2009) · Nature Chemical Biology · doi:10.1038/nchembio.164 · Cited by 2,327
Mittler, R., Vanderauwera, S., Suzuki, N., Miller, G., Tognetti, V. B., Vandepoele, K., Gollery, M., Shulaev, V., & Van Breusegem, F. (2011) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2011.03.007 · Cited by 2,305
Ryals, J. A., Neuenschwander, U. H., Willits, M. G., Molina, A., Steiner, H. Y., & Hunt, M. D. (1996) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.8.10.1809 · Cited by 1,988
Cited by
Köhl, J., Kolnaar, R., & Ravensberg, W. J. (2019) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2019.00845 · Cited by 1,382
Exploitation of microbial antagonists for the control of postharvest diseases of fruits: a review
Dukare, A. S., Paul, S., Nambi, V. E., Gupta, R. K., Singh, R., Sharma, K., & Vishwakarma, R. K. (2019) · Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition · doi:10.1080/10408398.2017.1417235 · Cited by 510
Combining Biocontrol Agents with Chemical Fungicides for Integrated Plant Fungal Disease Control
Ons, L., Bylemans, D., Thevissen, K., & Cammue, B. P. A. (2020) · Microorganisms · doi:10.3390/microorganisms8121930 · Cited by 438
Screening for novel biocontrol agents applicable in plant disease management – A review
Raymaekers, K., Ponet, L., Holtappels, D., Berckmans, B., & Cammue, B. P. A. (2020) · Biological Control · doi:10.1016/j.biocontrol.2020.104240 · Cited by 367
Perumal, A. B., Nambiar, R. B., Sellamuthu, P. S., & Emmanuel, R. S. (2021) · LWT · doi:10.1016/j.lwt.2021.111662 · Cited by 113
Metadata
- Authors
- Romanazzi, G., Sanzani, S. M., Bi, Y., Tian, S., Gutiérrez Martínez, P., & Alkan, N.
- Venue
- Postharvest Biology and Technology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-12
- Volume
- 122
- Pages
- 82-94
- ISSN
- 0925-5214 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2507250986
- Cited by
- 451
- References
- 165
- FWCI
- 31.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Induced resistance to control postharvest decay of fruit and vegetables. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2016.08.003
- The paper
- Romanazzi, G., Sanzani, S. M., Bi, Y., Tian, S., Gutiérrez Martínez, P., & Alkan, N. (2016). Induced resistance to control postharvest decay of fruit and vegetables. Postharvest Biology and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2016.08.003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.