Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 451

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 165 of the 165 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Induced resistance to control postharvest decay of fruit and vegetables

Open access
Romanazzi, Gianfranco, Sanzani, Simona Marianna, Bi, Yang, Tian, Shiping, Gutiérrez Martínez, Porfirio, Alkan, Noam·2016·Postharvest Biology and Technology

Abstract

More than one third of harvested fruit and vegetables are lost and do not reach the customers mainly due to postharvest decay. During the last decade, several postharvest fungicides have been excluded from the market, or their allowed residues have been significantly decreased. Therefore, there is growing interest in eco-friendly and safe alternatives to synthetic fungicides. Induced resistance has gained increasing attention as a sustainable strategy to manage postharvest decay of fruit and vegetables. Their natural resistance can be increased by various means, such as biocontrol agents or their secreted elicitors. Alternatively, physical means, such as UV-C, ozone, and heat treatment, can prime plant resistance through abiotic stress. Moreover, various defense-related phytohormones, biological elicitors, non-organic elicitors, and volatile organic compounds have been shown to induce plant resistance. During the last decades, new technologies have enabled the evaluation of gene expression, such as quantitative real time PCR and the most recent next-generation sequencing, and thus the quantification of physiological changes, which have revealed new knowledge about preharvest and postharvest induced resistance in response to various treatments. These techniques allow optimization of postharvest application of the control means, although these data cannot disregard the evaluation of in vivo effectiveness. The elicitation of host defenses prevents the appearance of resistant isolates of pathogens. Induced resistance can lead to increased levels of phenolic compounds in the plant tissues, which often have antioxidant properties that are highly beneficial to humans. Moreover, induced resistance preserves the natural microflora, which is rich in potential biocontrol agents, and which provides a combined approach in the control of postharvest decay that is sustainable and safe for both growers and consumers. This approach meets the requirements of integrated disease management on sustainable use of pesticides that in the EU is implemented through Directive 128/2009. This review summarizes recent achievements and knowledge of the elicitation of host defenses to control postharvest decay of fruit and vegetables, and provides an outlook on the new challenges in this fascinating subject.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2016.08.003

Cites

165 of 165 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 165 references

Cited by

See all 451

Metadata

Authors
Romanazzi, G., Sanzani, S. M., Bi, Y., Tian, S., Gutiérrez Martínez, P., & Alkan, N.
Venue
Postharvest Biology and Technology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-12
Volume
122
Pages
82-94
ISSN
0925-5214 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2507250986
Cited by
451
References
165
FWCI
31.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Induced resistance to control postharvest decay of fruit and vegetables. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2016.08.003
The paper
Romanazzi, G., Sanzani, S. M., Bi, Y., Tian, S., Gutiérrez Martínez, P., & Alkan, N. (2016). Induced resistance to control postharvest decay of fruit and vegetables. Postharvest Biology and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2016.08.003

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.